Here are some recent basic science and clinical abstracts related to OMM. I think our profession needs to continue to produce high quality relevant research in physical and manipulative modalities:
TITLE: Single-blind randomised controlled trial of chemonucleolysis and manipulation in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation [In Process Citation]
AUTHORS: Burton AK; Tillotson KM; Cleary J
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: Spinal Research Unit, University of Huddersfield, UK.
SOURCE: Eur Spine J 2000 Jun;9(3):202-7
[MEDLINE record in process]
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10905437 UI: 20361372
ABSTRACT: This single-blind randomised clinical trial compared osteopathic manipulative treatment with chemonucleolysis (used as a control of known efficacy) for symptomatic lumbar disc herniation. Forty patients with sciatica due to this diagnosis (confirmed by imaging) were treated either by chemonucleolysis or manipulation. Outcomes (leg pain, back pain and self-reported disability) were measured at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 12 months. The mean values for all outcomes improved in both groups. By 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in outcome between the treatments, but manipulation produced a statistically significant greater improvement for back pain and disability in the first few weeks. A similar number from both groups required additional orthopaedic intervention; there were no serious complications. Crude cost analysis suggested an overall financial advantage from manipulation. Because osteopathic manipulation produced a 12-month outcome that was equivalent to chemonucleolysis, it can be considered as an option for the treatment of symptomatic lumbar disc herniation, at least in the absence of clear indications for surgery. Further study into the value of manipulation at a more acute stage is warranted.
TITLE: The effects of manually applied intermittent pulsation pressure to rat ventral thorax on lymph transport [In Process Citation]
AUTHORS: Dery MA; Yonuschot G; Winterson BJ
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: Department of Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine, University of New England, Biddeford, Maine, USA.
SOURCE: Lymphology 2000 Jun;33(2):58-61
[MEDLINE record in process]
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10897471 UI: 20355662
ABSTRACT: The present study evaluated the effects of tissue massage on a part of the body remote from the region of lymph uptake into the initial lymphatics. Lymph uptake was assessed with a fluorescent probe placed in a potential space of the lower extremity of anesthetized female Sprague-Dawley rats. Tail blood was assayed at intervals over 15 hours for fluorescence. A total of 63 animals were utilized (treatment = 32 and control = 31). The manipulated group received lymph flow enhancing treatment (LFET) five minutes per rat per hour until they were aroused. The control group were left lying prone in cages until a blood sample was taken. The LFET procedure was bilateral finger pressure applied to the lower ribs of a supine rat followed immediately by a light tap to the sternum. These maneuvers were repeated for 5 minutes. The rate of appearance of fluorescent probe was greater during the first nine hours of the experiment in the treatment group than in the controls but not at hours 12 and 15. This study demonstrates that mechanical pressure to body regions physically distant from the location of lymph formation enhances lymph uptake.
TITLE: Manual therapy for asthma.
AUTHORS: Hondras MA; Linde K; Jones AP
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: Western States Chiropractic College, 2900 NE 132nd Avenue, Portland, Oregon 97230-3099, USA.
[email protected]
SOURCE: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;(2):CD001002
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10796578 UI: 20257668
ABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: A variety of manual therapies with similar postulated biologic mechanisms of action are commonly used to treat patients with asthma. Manual therapy practitioners are also varied, including physiotherapists, respiratory therapists, chiropractic and osteopathic physicians. A systematic review across disciplines is warranted. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the evidence for the effects of manual therapies for treatment of patients with bronchial asthma. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials were searched in computerized general (EMBASE, CINAHL and MEDLINE) and specialized databases (Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field, Cochrane Rehabilitation Field, ICL, and MANTIS). In addition, bibliographies from included studies were assessed, and authors of known studies were contacted for additional information about published and unpublished trials. Date of most recent search: December 1998. SELECTION CRITERIA: Trials were included if they: (1) were randomised; (2) included asthmatic children or adults; (3) examined one or more types of manual therapy; and (4) included clinical outcomes. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: All three reviewers independently extracted data and assessed trial quality using a standard form. MAIN RESULTS: From an initial 316 unique citations, 48 full text articles were retrieved and evaluated, which resulted in nine citations to five RCTs (290 patients) suitable for inclusion. Trials could not be pooled statistically because studies that addressed similar interventions used disparate patient groups or outcomes. The methodological quality of one of two trials examining chiropractic manipulation was good and neither trial found significant differences between chiropractic spinal manipulation and a sham manoeuvre on any of the outcomes measured. Quality of the remaining three trials was poor. One small trial compared massage therapy with a relaxation control group and found significant differences in many of the lung function measures obtained. However, this trial had poor reporting characteristics and the data have yet to be confirmed. One small trial compared chest physiotherapy to placebo and one small trial compared footzone therapy to a no treatment control. Neither trial found differences in lung function between groups. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support the use of manual therapies for patients with asthma. There is a need to conduct adequately-sized RCTs that examine the effects of manual therapies on clinically relevant outcomes. Future trials should maintain observer blinding for outcome assessments, and report on the costs of care and adverse events. Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support or refute the use of manual therapy for patients with asthma.
TITLE: Inter-examiner and intra-examiner agreement for assessing sacroiliac anatomical landmarks using palpation and observation: pilot study.
AUTHORS: O'Haire C; Gibbons P
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: School of Health Sciences, Victoria University, Australia.
SOURCE: Man Ther 2000 Feb;5(1):13-20
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10688955 UI: 20157025
ABSTRACT: Despite the paucity of research into the reliability of static palpation, it is still employed extensively as a diagnostic tool by manual medicine practitioners. This study tested the inter- and intra-examiner agreement of ten senior osteopathic students using static palpation on ten asymptomatic subjects. Four assessments of the posterior superior iliac spine (PSIS), sacral sulcus (SS), and the sacral inferior lateral angle (SILA) on every subject by all examiners resulted in 1200 assessments in total. Kappa (Kg) yielded intra-examiner agreement that ranged between less-than-chance to substantial for the SILA (Kg=-0.05 to 0.69; mean Kg=0.21), and slight to moderate for the PSIS (Kg=0.07 to 0.58; mean Kg=0.33) and the SS (Kg=0.02 to Kg=0.60; mean Kg=0.24), with 50% significant beyond the 0.05 level. Inter-examiner agreement was slight (PSIS Kg=0.04; SILA Kg=0.08; SS Kg=0.07) and significant at the 0.01 level. Intra-examiner agreement was greater than inter-examiner agreement, which was consistent with existing palpation reliability studies. The poor reliability of clinical tests involving palpation may be partially explained by error in landmark location. Copyright 2000 Harcourt Publishers Ltd.
TITLE: Manual and manipulation techniques for rheumatic disease.
AUTHORS: Fiechtner JJ; Brodeur RR
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: Division of Rheumatology, Michigan State University, Colleges of Osteopathic and Human Medicine, East Lansing, USA.
SOURCE: Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2000 Feb;26(1):83-96, ix
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10680196 UI: 20144448
ABSTRACT: Manipulation is practiced primarily by chiropractors and osteopaths and is one of the most commonly utilized alternative treatments for rheumatic diseases. Low back pain and neck pain are the most frequently treated disorders, but manipulation is also used to treat a broad range of rheumatic diseases. Manipulation has been shown to decrease joint pain and normalize function. The mechanisms of action, however, are not well understood. Current theories propose an imbalance of muscle activity is a source of pain that manipulation can relieve through reflexive actions. Such muscle imbalances would exacerbate rheumatic and arthritic conditions, suggesting that manipulation may be an important therapy that is appropriate for early conservative care as part of a comprehensive treatment program.
ITLE: [Evaluation and critical review published in the European literature on osteopathic studies in the clinical field and in the area of fundamental research]
VERNACULAR TITLE: Evaluierung und kritische Bewertung von in der europaischen Literatur veroffentlichten, osteopathischen Studien im klinischen Bereich und im Bereich der Grundlagenforschung.
AUTHORS: Schwerla F; Hass-Degg K; Schwerla B
AUTHOR AFFILIATION: A.R.E.D.O.E. Deutschland, Gauting.
[email protected]
SOURCE: Forsch Komplementarmed 1999 Dec;6(6):302-10
CITATION IDS: PMID: 10649001 UI: 20116111
ABSTRACT: OBJECTIVE: Identification of studies of osteopathic treatment in defined countries. Evaluation of methods and results of the studies and assessment of the available evidence concerning the effectiveness of osteopathy. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. Assessment of the quality of the studies, with respect to the osteopathic concept and current methodological criteria according to predefined keys. DATA SOURCES: Clinical trials and fundamental studies originating from Germany, England, Austria, The Netherlands, Scandinavia +/- published or unpublished. RESULTS: Out of a total of 30 studies retrieved, 9 reached the predetermined minimum number of points to be rated into quality categories. In 2 of these studies the osteopathic treatment was more effective than the control intervention (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: No definitive conclusions about the effectiveness of osteopathy can be drawn so far because of the low number of evaluated studies. It seems necessary to scrutinize the relevance of osteopathy through further methodologically adequate studies. Additionally, criteria for evaluation are proposed which correspond to the highest international standards in order to ensure a valid (and commonly accepted) evaluation of the osteopathic literature. Copyright 1999 S. Karger GmbH, Freiburg