I am a member of ISIS, ASIPP and AAPM.
What we need are decent journals, not feel-good joint ventures. The material being published is appalling. I think to a certain extent it's a case of too many journals chasing too few quality studies so filler gets used, but the editorial bar seems to be set very low. In many of the papers it's impossible to truly understand what was done and how it was analyzed, and the authors seem to be allowed to make any old damn fool statement they wish.
I just had an email discussion with a PharmD student about the recent paper in Pain Medicine by Gallagher et al on dosing frequency with extended-release opioids. She tore it to shreds. She also pointed out that the editors allowed a statement about the need for better long-acting drugs, when the study was sponsored by Endo (manufacturer of Opana). I had to explain to her that doctors don't know anything about science.