- Joined
- Dec 2, 2003
- Messages
- 44
- Reaction score
- 0
Smith GC, Pell JP. Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2003;327: 1459-61.
Many of you have probably already heard about this aritcle, it was one of the Emergency Medicine Abtracts reviewed at the ACEP conference in SF. This is a very tongue and cheek research article written for the BMJ that states that
Worth looking at for a good laugh.
Read the abstract here:
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14684649
Many of you have probably already heard about this aritcle, it was one of the Emergency Medicine Abtracts reviewed at the ACEP conference in SF. This is a very tongue and cheek research article written for the BMJ that states that
As with many interventions intended to prevent ill health, the effectiveness of parachutes has not been subjected to rigorous evaluation by using randomised controlled trials. Advocates of evidence based medicine have criticised the adoption of interventions evaluated by using only observational data. We think that everyone might benefit if the most radical protagonists of evidence based medicine organised and participated in a double blind, randomised, placebo controlled, crossover trial of the parachute.
Worth looking at for a good laugh.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/...ve&db=pubmed&dopt=Abstract&list_uids=14684649