Last edited:
Radiology as a field is in a world of hurt right now. IR is extremely competitive because the diagnostic radiology market is facing significant reimbursement and salary cuts as well as volume declines. There's a reason you picked path. Matching in a top tier path > matching in a lower-tier radiology program (which is where you will be with your Step 1 scores and also the fact you're walking away from your path spot).Hi guys,
I have matched into one of the top tier pathology residency program, but over time i realized i am more interested in rads, esp. intervention radiology. I love diagnostics, but will miss the procedures in pathology. i had thought about it before but in haste made a decision for path.
i have decent step scores, 240/250. Can you please show me some light on how to proceed further!
Any advice will be appreciated!
This is really really incorrect and belies ignorance of radiology as a specialty. General radiologists do ever increasing amounts of procedures (procedures that IM, surgery or family med people don't want to do or can't do anymore), and interventional radiologists spend all day doing procedures depending on the practice. Malpractice lawyer? Wtf are you smoking? Also, have you ever heard of the pathology job market??And if you really wanted to do procedures, you should have gone into IM, surgery, gas or family med anyway. Going down the radiology path in order to do procedures is like going through a surgical residency in order to become a malpractice lawyer.
This is really really incorrect and belies ignorance of radiology as a specialty. General radiologists do ever increasing amounts of procedures (procedures that IM, surgery or family med people don't want to do or can't do anymore), and interventional radiologists spend all day doing procedures depending on the practice. Malpractice lawyer? Wtf are you smoking? Also, have you ever heard of the pathology job market??
In any case, you could definitely switch but you'd most likely lose at least a year. Maybe more depending on if you're recently matched or matched last year, which I can't tell by your post. I guess there's an off-chance this late in the game you could find an open prelim medicine or prelim surgery spot and then reapply to radiology next year, but that's dependent on if your PD would allow you to do that.
Okay, as is par for the course, you previously left out the part about being an IMG. Do you need a visa? These are important factors when assessing your ability to switch specialties in addition to the fact that you will not have full funding.
You are an IMG and want to leave a residency? That's a remarkably bad idea.
Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
You are an IMG and want to leave a residency? That's a remarkably bad idea.
Sent from my iPhone 6 using Tapatalk
Yea that's right. I am a non- US IMG needing visa, so i think a lot of things gonna come into play!
!Normally, it would certainly be possible as rads is in a really bad position now, and spots are plentiful. However, you are 1-IMG 2-NON-US IMG 3-need a visa, all bad things
You also matched in path, which is a rather different field from rads and it would be hard to make a case. Also how would you get letter(s) for rads or do rotations? I also think that working a year or 2 is also a terrible idea, since not only will your funding clock run, but radiology is a LONG path, no less than 6 years and possibly longer.
It's not going to pan out.yea there is a lot of issues. What i was thinking was to talk to the rads PD at my institute, start of next year and see what he has to say. If he can give me some research work or i can shadow at rads deptt in off hours, i might be able to get a gather a rads LOR. Also i have a physician's letter from before. So that's what i was thinking. But not sure how its going to pan out.
Yea rads is a long program and funding is definitely gonna be an issue.
It's not going to pan out.
You basically have 2 choices:
1. Bail now (or in 45 days so you don't piss off the NRMP) and take your chances with applying to a specialty you have no contacts in, LORs for or a paper trail to explain why you want to do it. (Spoiler Alert...this will likely end badly for you, but your chances aren't zero...just close.)
2. Learn to enjoy being a pathologist.
Radiology as a field is in a world of hurt right now. IR is extremely competitive because the diagnostic radiology market is facing significant reimbursement and salary cuts as well as volume declines. There's a reason you picked path. Matching in a top tier path > matching in a lower-tier radiology program (which is where you will be with your Step 1 scores and also the fact you're walking away from your path spot).
And if you really wanted to do procedures, you should have gone into IM, surgery, gas or family med anyway. Going down the radiology path in order to do procedures is like going through a surgical residency in order to become a malpractice lawyer.
You would be in match violation if you bailed right now before you even start.
There are generally a small number of lateral switches in radiology (usually from surgical fields). There's nothing that says it's impossible, but the lack of a clinical internship + the visa issues make this not an ideal idea unless it's within the same institution.
The comment about procedures is wrong, as above. While there are academic subspecialty jobs without procedures, many if not most jobs involve "IR" (particularly in private practice). While VIR is necessary to do high end arterial work, every radiologist is trained to do the various other procedures (biopsies, drainages, para/thora, LP/myelo, venous work/access, etc). The point being, most clinicians spend a portion of their time doing procedures and a portion of their time being clinicians. If you'd prefer to do procedures and do diagnostics, there's nothing wrong with choosing radiology (current job market notwithstanding).
Couple of questions.
1. In path don't you get to do autopsies and isn't that sort of procedural?
2. Was there something you liked about path at one point and why don't you still like that?
Given the hurdles IMGs face with residency, I'm not sure why you wouldn't give path a try. You'll get a couple of years of residency salary, you can get licensed and sort out your visa issues. That puts you way head of most of the IMGs we see in bad situations on SDN. And if you later decide path is not for you you can always be one of those gluttons for punishment who go back to do a second residency.
Switching from surgery to path, I actually enjoy the hands-on part. There's grossing specimens which come out of the OR (not particularly intellectually demanding but still enjoyable from a praxis perspective); and the three clinical procedures that pathologists perform: FNAs on thyroid nodules, bone marrow biopsies, and (some places) apheresis. In dermatopathology path residents see patients and very, very rarely perform dinky procedures in clinic.
However all that being said obviously one does not choose path if procedures turn them on.
You must have read my posts from 2008.
And yes, obviously, but believe it or not path runs FNA clinics. They offer stat preliminary diagnoses (or at least assurances of the sufficiency of the specimen) which other specialties cannot do. At least that's the market pitch.
I'm touched you're interested, and I've always been an open book on this site....
I was gung-ho on plastics and lined up four straight sub-is after my research year. Didn't find it satisfying and could never make my peace with cosmetic "medicine," even in training, and felt much more well-suited to GS. In GS residency began to grow more and more interested with mechanism-level questions and grew less and less interested in algorithmic patient care. Have been in the lab for the last two years and am decidedly more motivated by the cerebral, fancy side of medicine. Took me a while to make up my mind since I genuinely enjoy patient relationships but have realized I can do without it, but I can't do without the thinking, stimulation, and cutting-edge scientific applications path provides. Very happy with my choice; am hoping to specialize in pediatric path + potentially cardiac pathology. Love new Mendelian disorders, fancy next-gen genetics techniques, and old-fashioned gross morphology. Like autopsies too.
Aren't you switching fields, too? From rads?
Switching from surgery to path, I actually enjoy the hands-on part. There's grossing specimens which come out of the OR (not particularly intellectually demanding but still enjoyable from a praxis perspective); and the three clinical procedures that pathologists perform: FNAs on thyroid nodules, bone marrow biopsies, and (some places) apheresis. In dermatopathology path residents see patients and very, very rarely perform dinky procedures in clinic.
However all that being said obviously one does not choose path if procedures turn them on.
You must have read my posts from 2008.
And yes, obviously, but believe it or not path runs FNA clinics. They offer stat preliminary diagnoses (or at least assurances of the sufficiency of the specimen) which other specialties cannot do. At least that's the market pitch.
It's also part of pathology training (as is bone marrow biopsy, or at least it used to be). But you're correct, it will be hospital/program specific. In my training hospital, endo and path traded weeks running the FNA clinic.that is probably hospital specific ….but the hospitals i have been in path doesn't do FNAs…endo (and its a requirement for our boards) and IR are the one that i have seen do it…one place we did have the cytopathologist present to make sure there were sufficient cells, but that's not typical and they didn't do the actual FNA.
interesting…we haven't had any path residents come into the clinic, which is run by the Endo attendings...It's also part of pathology training (as is bone marrow biopsy, or at least it used to be). But you're correct, it will be hospital/program specific. In my training hospital, endo and path traded weeks running the FNA clinic.
yes path does do autopsies, and are the most interesting ones (imo) because are usually focused on disease processes.Couple of questions.
1. In path don't you get to do autopsies and isn't that sort of procedural?
2. Was there something you liked about path at one point and why don't you still like that?
Given the hurdles IMGs face with residency, I'm not sure why you wouldn't give path a try. You'll get a couple of years of residency salary, you can get licensed and sort out your visa issues. That puts you way head of most of the IMGs we see in bad situations on SDN. And if you later decide path is not for you you can always be one of those gluttons for punishment who go back to do a second residency.
yes path does do autopsies, and are the most interesting ones (imo) because are usually focused on disease processes.
But most autopsies are for legal reasons and i am sure physicians specialized on medical law do those. Not every pathologist does autopsies.
I'm touched you're interested, and I've always been an open book on this site....
I was gung-ho on plastics and lined up four straight sub-is after my research year. Didn't find it satisfying and could never make my peace with cosmetic "medicine," even in training, and felt much more well-suited to GS. In GS residency began to grow more and more interested with mechanism-level questions and grew less and less interested in algorithmic patient care. Have been in the lab for the last two years and am decidedly more motivated by the cerebral, fancy side of medicine. Took me a while to make up my mind since I genuinely enjoy patient relationships but have realized I can do without it, but I can't do without the thinking, stimulation, and cutting-edge scientific applications path provides. Very happy with my choice; am hoping to specialize in pediatric path + potentially cardiac pathology. Love new Mendelian disorders, fancy next-gen genetics techniques, and old-fashioned gross morphology. Like autopsies too.
I'm touched you're interested, and I've always been an open book on this site....
I was gung-ho on plastics and lined up four straight sub-is after my research year. Didn't find it satisfying and could never make my peace with cosmetic "medicine," even in training, and felt much more well-suited to GS. In GS residency began to grow more and more interested with mechanism-level questions and grew less and less interested in algorithmic patient care. Have been in the lab for the last two years and am decidedly more motivated by the cerebral, fancy side of medicine. Took me a while to make up my mind since I genuinely enjoy patient relationships but have realized I can do without it, but I can't do without the thinking, stimulation, and cutting-edge scientific applications path provides. Very happy with my choice; am hoping to specialize in pediatric path + potentially cardiac pathology. Love new Mendelian disorders, fancy next-gen genetics techniques, and old-fashioned gross morphology. Like autopsies too.