tatabox80 said:
Another question, I've heard that peds specialists have to devote a great deal of their time to research. I know that fellowships require a substatial amount of research, but is this really necessary when you are done, or can you focus primarly on patient care?
It depends on the program and the specialty.
I can only tell you that in my three year Neonatal-perinatal fellowship I did a total of 13 months on the clinical service and the rest on research. I actually voluntarily took an extra month on service!! The rest of the fellows only did 12.
Clinical time on your research month consisted of 3 or 4 night calls only.
Granted this was only 1 specialty and one specific program, but I believe that it's pretty typical.
I NEVER wanted a career in research and I felt I really got the shaft in terms of the one-size fits all mentality of the people that decide how to train neonatologists.
Considering the compensation offered in many centers, there are lots of us that would love to join faculty at academic centers but find it quite impossible to repay significant med school loans and live on the $$ offered in academic neonatology.
There were 5 fellows in my class and NONE of us did academic neonatology. All went into private practice.
Was society really helped by my research projects looking at minutia?
Are my patients really served today since out of my three years of training, two of them were spent in the care of a pipette?
This underscores the importance of training in a very big and busy program so you can cram as much experience as possible into the short time frame you actually spend in the NICU
BUT this is the game you have to play to get your subspecialty training, so you grin and smile and wait until it's over.
Being a subepecialist is pretty cool. I would put up with the screwed up training scheme all over again, as would most of my friends that are practicing a pediatric subspecialty.
Like I said, some are far more clinical than others in terms of fellowship training time ( like peds ER )