After rereading some of these responses, I did want to add that I don't think having people review and critique your work really constitutes the type of sharing that shouldn't be practiced. It's a pretty universal practice for people to have others read their college/graduate application essays, because many people do not write well enough to go about it on their own, and need an outside eye to help them make effective changes. Therefore, while I agree that trying to follow a template of someone else's personal statement is not a very practical or original approach (as admissions committees want to know what makes YOU uniquely qualified to be an OT, in your own words), I DO think it's a good idea to draft something up, and then have a few qualified people look over it and suggest some appropriate changes. As for a "current OT student partaking in this", which I can only interpret as referring to the person who offered to review the OP's statement, I really don't see the issue with this, as the person offering is already in OT school and would not benefit personally from doing so. As long as the person doing the reviewing gives feedback in the forms of ideas to incorporate or change, and does not write any actual content, the onus is on the OP to make changes on their own. I don't think this is the same as plagiarizing. If it were, universities would not have writing centers (which ostensibly do what I am describing) as they would be breaking their own code of conduct.