owlegrad
Uncontrollable Sarcasm Machine
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
Lifetime Donor
15+ Year Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2009
- Messages
- 25,314
- Reaction score
- 11,929
I don’t know, but they not only need to stop opening up new schools, they need to shut down existing schools. The problem isn’t that the number of pharmacy school graduates is expanding from 15,000 to 16,000 for 5,000 jobs, but rather that there currently exists 15,000 graduates for 5,000 jobs TODAY.
The ideal system:
-Get rid of a year of pharmacy school. There's plenty of useless information for us to get away with just 5. I don't need to memorize the structure of every drug and the muscles/bones of the body twice. Teach me about the medications, how to counsel, provide patient care, and follow guidelines.
-Also, replace P4 year with mandatory paid PGY1. Why do we do the same thing again? Paying for it the first time and a reduced salary the second time? There are enough P4 rotations for all these students because it's free labor. PGY1 spots are limited because they're paid. I'm sure Walgreens and CVS would love to open more residency positions (RPh at 50% pay).
1-year undergrad, P1, P2, P3, mandatory PGY1
Out in 5 years with plenty of jobs. Why doesn't this happen? Because there's money to be made by opening more pharmacy schools and charging for "clinical rotations" and as many years of school as possible. This would be ideal to shoot for, but good luck to us.
Schools wouldn't open because they know there wouldn't be spots for their students. Honestly, it's sad, but there are no jobs for all these graduates anyway. Popping a bubble early is always better than popping it later. At least students would be able to see how limited the job market really is before the fact and compete for spots.
I did an international rotation in Australia and one of the things we looked at was the education differences between our systems. They have 4 years of classes followed by an intern year which isn't all that different from a year of residency.I'm not sure how well this would work though. The 3-year program would have to be year-round without breaks. Even then, besides UOP which actually has a decent 3-year program, the other 3-year students I've worked with have not been that great.
too little, too late
50%? more like 85%50% of what we learn in pre-pharm/pharmacy school isn't relevant. I could learn enough chemistry to be a pharmacist in one semester, not two years. Do you honestly think we spend years learning how to calculate how much the temperature changes in a cup of water when you drop heated metal in it, memorizing organic chemistry reactions, metabolism pathways, etc because they school wants you to be a good pharmacist? No, it's because you can charge more that way. I don't know about you, but 90% of the important information I got in pharmacy school was about a couple years worth of material. I was talking about the ideal situation, not saying that it's going to happen. No one person is at fault and no one does this on purpose. But in the system we currently have this is how things have been allowed to happen.
Lucinda Maine making over 300k at AACP, school Deans raking in $$$, ASHP,APHA doing the same thing, BOP's bought by big pharma, and ACPE will back down the minute an ambulance chasing attorney makes a claim against one of their "standards". Honestly, I'm ashamed to be part of this hypocrisy.
For profit colleges keep opening and closing. Another Corinthian college scheme.
Corinthian Colleges - Wikipedia
That's the first time dumb ass Lucinda whatever acknowledged there is a problem with pharmacists surplus.As expected - ACPE would be violating antitrust laws if they tried to do anything like this. Still it is nice to dream.
That's the first time dumb ass Lucinda whatever acknowledged there is a problem with pharmacists surplus.
So what should be the next steps? Go to individual pharmacy schools and begin harassing them to cut their class size? If we do a petition like this for each school with 12k signatures each we might make some progress...
you think they have a way to handle the immense amount of schools but do not want to implement it? is that what you are saying?"When someone tells you it can't be done, it's more a reflection of their limitations, not yours". ACPE can hide behind antitrust laws but they have already come up gameplans for too many schools. They just don't want to implement them because they feel we are not at a critical mass.
That gives me a great idea. I’ll create a petition to “lobby” for the profession, raise funds and pocket the money from desperate pharmacists, pharmacy students and technicians (using a legit-looking website as a front). Easiest scam since Alex Barker.Most build boards are $750-1000 per month... I think if Change Pharmacy starts fundraising this would be a very successful way to get enrollment cut
I'm not sure how well this would work though. The 3-year program would have to be year-round without breaks. Even then, besides UOP which actually has a decent 3-year program, the other 3-year students I've worked with have not been that great.
The ideal system:
-Get rid of a year of pharmacy school. There's plenty of useless information for us to get away with just 5. I don't need to memorize the structure of every drug and the muscles/bones of the body twice. Teach me about the medications, how to counsel, provide patient care, and follow guidelines.
-Also, replace P4 year with mandatory paid PGY1. Why do we do the same thing again? Paying for it the first time and a reduced salary the second time? There are enough P4 rotations for all these students because it's free labor. PGY1 spots are limited because they're paid. I'm sure Walgreens and CVS would love to open more residency positions (RPh at 50% pay).
1-year undergrad, P1, P2, P3, mandatory PGY1
Out in 5 years with plenty of jobs. Why doesn't this happen? Because there's money to be made by opening more pharmacy schools and charging for "clinical rotations" and as many years of school as possible. This would be ideal to shoot for, but good luck to us.
Schools wouldn't open because they know there wouldn't be spots for their students. Honestly, it's sad, but there are no jobs for all these graduates anyway. Popping a bubble early is always better than popping it later. At least students would be able to see how limited the job market really is before the fact and compete for spots.
50% of what we learn in pre-pharm/pharmacy school isn't relevant. I could learn enough chemistry to be a pharmacist in one semester, not two years. Do you honestly think we spend years learning how to calculate how much the temperature changes in a cup of water when you drop heated metal in it, memorizing organic chemistry reactions, metabolism pathways, etc because they school wants you to be a good pharmacist? No, it's because you can charge more that way. I don't know about you, but 90% of the important information I got in pharmacy school was about a couple years worth of material. I was talking about the ideal situation, not saying that it's going to happen. No one person is at fault and no one does this on purpose. But in the system we currently have this is how things have been allowed to happen.
We need to do what we can to shut down MCW, William Carey, High Point, California Health Sciences, Larkin, Marshall B. Ketchum. I think we should seriously consider build boards near these schools (+ all other predatory schools) to push down their applications and force them to close
LOL or APHAThat gives me a great idea. I’ll create a petition to “lobby” for the profession, raise funds and pocket the money from desperate pharmacists, pharmacy students and technicians (using a legit-looking website as a front). Easiest scam since Alex Barker.
As expected - ACPE would be violating antitrust laws if they tried to do anything like this. Still it is nice to dream.
Would you hire a pharmacist trained by any of these schools??? Maybe if it were the chains that took the legal the legal and financial responsibility for med errors there would be a certain natural selection and these schools would disappear (who would hire a pharmacist from a school which has shown statistically a greater probability of creating incompetent and costly professionals; who who go to a school no one hires from)
Maybe....
We are all coming at this from the wrong direction. We members of SDN should strike while the iron is hot and open a new school of pharmacy.
Real 1 on 1 time with teachersvery soon schools can advertise that they have great teacher-to-student ration like 100-to-1
And tuition will be $900k per studentvery soon schools can advertise that they have great teacher-to-student ratio like 100-to-1
And tuition will be $900k per student