- Joined
- Jul 12, 2002
- Messages
- 337
- Reaction score
- 1
OK so I'm looking ahead to the future, and I noticed that there are a substantial number of states which place a time limit on how long your USMLE scores are valid.
Usually, they frame it in a time to completion from Step 1 to 3. For example, a good number of states say that you must complete step 1 to 3 in a span of 7 years or less.
I dont think that will be a problem because i dont plan on staying longer than 8 years, but still I'd like to attempt to get them to change this rule just in case. With 7 years, its cutting it pretty close.
What kind of arguments can I use in my petition? I realize that it probably wont do any good, but if I start now and keep up the pressure, perhaps by the time I graduate they will change their bylaws. I was going to write about how easing the requirements would encourage more MD/PhDs to practice in that state, which would bring in federal research dollars. I'm also going to advocate that they dont necessarily need to totally remove the time requirement, just make it a little more flexible specifically for MD/PhDs and give them an extra year or two.
Are there any other compelling arguments that I'm missing here? How can I make this look like its in their best interest?
Usually, they frame it in a time to completion from Step 1 to 3. For example, a good number of states say that you must complete step 1 to 3 in a span of 7 years or less.
I dont think that will be a problem because i dont plan on staying longer than 8 years, but still I'd like to attempt to get them to change this rule just in case. With 7 years, its cutting it pretty close.
What kind of arguments can I use in my petition? I realize that it probably wont do any good, but if I start now and keep up the pressure, perhaps by the time I graduate they will change their bylaws. I was going to write about how easing the requirements would encourage more MD/PhDs to practice in that state, which would bring in federal research dollars. I'm also going to advocate that they dont necessarily need to totally remove the time requirement, just make it a little more flexible specifically for MD/PhDs and give them an extra year or two.
Are there any other compelling arguments that I'm missing here? How can I make this look like its in their best interest?