Pitt/Emory/UCSF

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

brown04

Member
7+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
20+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 2, 2003
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
any word on secondaries from any of these schools? just wondering. pitt's application status still says they haven't received my AMCAS, but that's got to be wrong.
 
I haven't heard anything from Emory either. But I did get something from their anesthesiology P.A. program, which isn't what I was expecting when I tore open the envelope!
 
Originally posted by brown04
pitt's application status still says they haven't received my AMCAS, but that's got to be wrong.

It says that for mine, too. Seems like it just means they haven't started processing yet or something. We should hear from them in the next week or so, I would think, based on when they got it out last year. UCSF could be any time in the next couple of months.
 
Originally posted by brown04
any word on secondaries from any of these schools? just wondering. pitt's application status still says they haven't received my AMCAS, but that's got to be wrong.

I havent heard anything from Pitt or Emory either. I hear the Pitt secondary is killer, the Emory secondary is supposed to be alright.
 
i talked to emory today. they said they will send out emails to all applicants for the secondary link in the next two weeks. pitt said they should have secondaries out "mid to the end of august". so basically, they're both on the same timeline. hope this helps.
 
Originally posted by premed2
i talked to emory today. they said they will send out emails to all applicants for the secondary link in the next two weeks. pitt said they should have secondaries out "mid to the end of august". so basically, they're both on the same timeline. hope this helps.

Thanks for the info premed2.
 
On Pitts website, when you check your status, it says they are updating their database and to check back on August 25. So I guess we shouldn't expect anything til at least then.
 
Top