I agree - the only time I have to look at this stuff right now is curling up for bed - who does that with a computer?? So a printed version is nice to have. However, I think Pitt's brochure is a particularly convincing brochure - really sells it as a huamistic approach to medicine.
The NJMS brochure made me chuckle - I mean I know Newark and the photos they picked make it look ...umm....'ideal'....all the same, I still would like to go to this school.
And as to the GW brochure - it felt kind of poor quality compared to the others, to me. I did think it was interesting that an SDNer was one of the students quoted, and I always think pictures of DC look inspiring...but the general quality of the writing and presentation was a little poor compared to the others.
And the Penn book...did anyone else notice that the people got progressively "homier" from really cute on the first two pages to physics majors on the last few??