Reply to thread

Hi Guest: Check out our new article here: It Pays to Be an Early (Financial) Bird

Message: <blockquote data-quote="BLADEMDA" data-source="post: 22238872" data-attributes="member: 147516"><p>Some of you people are just naive. Plain and simple.  A review of the case by the plaintiff’s expert will destroy you.  Your Analysis is flawed as seen by a jury of your peers. That’s who is going to determine your fate. So, for those who don’t get the cardiology note on high risk patients your defense won’t hold up and the case will be settled quickly. You are not viewed as equal to an expert in cardiology by the public. We all take calculated risks each and every day in our practice. I highly recommend good care along with appropriate consults with our colleagues regardless of whether it changes outcome.  I guarantee the one outcome it does change is whether you get sued or not.</p></blockquote><p></p>

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.