- Joined
- Apr 8, 2005
- Messages
- 735
- Reaction score
- 6
I really didn't expect a spread like this. Only 2/3 exclusively straight. Interesting.
OwnageMobile said:I really didn't expect a spread like this. Only 2/3 exclusively straight. Interesting.
Or maybe people on SDN are more likely to be gay/queer for some reason? All my family members who are gay are also the smartest/most driven/richest/alpha-type personalities.gary5 said:I'd guess that the heterosexual numbers are underrepresented. Heteros may be less interested in this survey.
Well, since 1/3 of the gay people are lesbians, maybe it's something else that is well worn/sore?gary5 said:If 1/3 of the population is non-straight, that's a lot of sore anuses (or is it ani?)
I'd imagine that they are less interested in the survey. If there was a poll of "What kind of car do you drive?" the responses would be from people who were more interested in cars. I've noticed that not many of my straight friends are into the issue of sexuality as an academic/social pursuit, but lots of gays/bis that I know are involved in student organizations/clubs/alliances/comittees/etc. relating to sexuality. So, maybe the LGBT crew is more likely to click on a thread.gary5 said:I'd guess that the heterosexual numbers are underrepresented. Heteros may be less interested in this survey.
Ahh.. the penetraphobic anus comments... Uhm, does it ever occur to the penetraphobes that half of the people engaged in anal sex are penetrators and not penetratees? Not to mention the women who don't penetrate their female partners anally. Geesh...gary5 said:I'd guess that the heterosexual numbers are underrepresented. Heteros may be less interested in this survey.
If 1/3 of the population is non-straight, that's a lot of sore anuses (or is it ani?)
Flopotomist said:Ahh.. the penetraphobic anus comments... Uhm, does it ever occur to the penetraphobes that half of the people engaged in anal sex are penetrators and not penetratees? Not to mention the women who don't penetrate their female partners anally. Geesh...
I understand asexuality as an experiental descriptor, but is it appropriate for an identity based survey? I mean, even the Pope, who presumably is asexual would identify as straight, no?Shrami said:asexual should definitely be on the list
That's the funniest goddamned thing I've read all week.Flopotomist said:I wanted to invent my own scale. I mean, how cool would it be to have the "Floppy Sexuality Scale"... oh wait, floppy and sex together.. not a good combo.
Only because if he didn't classify himself as such, he would be even more of a hypocrite than he already is.Flopotomist said:I understand asexuality as an experiental descriptor, but is it appropriate for an identity based survey? I mean, even the Pope, who presumably is asexual would identify as straight, no?
tigress said:I did want to mention that I read an article not too long ago about the new "asexual" movement of people who really identify themselves as asexual. I think it's odd and I have trouble believing there are really THAT many asexual people out there, but heck, who am I to judge? Interesting phenomenon, though.
Flop said:I understand asexuality as an experiental descriptor, but is it appropriate for an identity based survey? I mean, even the Pope, who presumably is asexual would identify as straight, no?
SeattlePostBach said:no sex drive at all. does not fantasize about anything. doesn't care about it. never thinks about sex with anyone....
And I keep hearing about more and more people like this. both women AND men.
I think everyone is attracted to Angelina. My boyfriend and I both think she is HOTTTTT! But then so is her brother....ivy91 said:100% hetero girl looking for male here. But now and again, I have girl crushes. There was a NYTimes article on that phenomenon - I'll try to find it. I love fine men, but I admit, I do go weak in the knee for Angelina Jolie.
ivy91 said:Apparently, Angelina thinks her brother is hot too, a la kissing him on the lips in public. I heard on the radio (always a reliable source, ) that in a survey of men and women in relationships, something like 40% of men said they would cheat with Angelina, and 60% of women said they would cheat with Angelina. Yup, that's my girl.
I much rather be referred to as "Flop" than some word describing who I am attracted to. I mean, it is kinda irrelevant. Do you like to be referred to as "That guy that is attracted to blondes with big boobs" or do you prefer "DaMota."DaMota said:i just wanna ask a question without getting yelled at. sometimes i'll refer to someone as queer, cuz i think it is politically correct/socially acceptable, but people have a hissy fit over it. my gay friends refer to themselves as queer, queens, etc. i don't get it. what do you prefer being referred to as?
-mota
Flopotomist said:I much rather be referred to as "Flop" than some word describing who I am attracted to. I mean, it is kinda irrelevant. Do you like to be referred to as "That guy that is attracted to blondes with big boobs" or do you prefer "DaMota."
When in doubt, I guess just ask - but then, why do you need to refer to the person's orientation anyways?
Hmm.. but probably shouldn't use the word "gay" to describe me then - it wouldn't "identify" me, and people might be confused. Use the phrase "tall, confused looking guy eating paste in the corner" then people will know who you are talking about.DaMota said:i agree completely. it just sometimes helps to identify people. its not like i use the word all the time. i'd be much more likely to refer to you as that funny guy, than that gay guy. but not everyone's as funny as you flop. i hope you get my point though. its like referring to that guy with the hot girlfriend, its just something that distinguishes people i guess.
-mota
Flopotomist said:Hmm.. but probably shouldn't use the word "gay" to describe me then - it wouldn't "identify" me, and people might be confused. Use the phrase "tall, confused looking guy eating paste in the corner" then people will know who you are talking about.
Flopotomist said:So if Angelina Jolie is the girl that turns straight girls gay, and gay boys straight... is there a male equivelent that turns straight boys gay and gay girls straight? Heath Ledger maybe?
Although I am neither a straight male or a gay female, I am going to have to go with Beck or Nicholas Cage.DaMota said:i wish i were brad pitt. but i wouldn't want to make out with the guy. i've always though ed norton was a pretty good looking chap as well.
-mota
Flopotomist said:So if Angelina Jolie is the girl that turns straight girls gay, and gay boys straight... is there a male equivelent that turns straight boys gay and gay girls straight? Heath Ledger maybe?
Flopotomist said:So if Angelina Jolie is the girl that turns straight girls gay, and gay boys straight... is there a male equivelent that turns straight boys gay and gay girls straight? Heath Ledger maybe?
ivy91 said:And Nat's not too shabby either. I saw her at Shakespeare in the Park in Central Park last year with her family. I'll put in a good word for ya
Messerschmitts said:favourite
mercaptovizadeh said:Natalie Portman is ugly.
Messerschmitts said:You don't really want me as an enemy. Ha ha, j/k. Rachel Weisz is very hot too, I agree with you there. I would like Hepburn, but she once said something disparaging against Chinese people.
mercaptovizadeh said:Angelina's a slut, and Natalie Portman is ugly. As are Kelly Clarkson, Mandy Moore, Britney Spears, and all the rest...
My type: Audrey Hepburn, Elizabeth Taylor, Grace Kelly........Monica Bellucci, Rachel Weisz, Roya Nonahali, Gong Li, Daniela Pestova.
And Lady MacBeth.
anon-y-mouse said:or, you could have used the kinsey scale?
oh and did anyone see the movie "Kinsey"?