Nah. Every time a study like this comes out, most of the OBs I know groan.
Retrospective data ≠ causation.
Needing over 70,000 pts to yield a + OR (and a fairly unimpressive one at that) suggests a pretty dubious signal to begin with.
Doesn’t seem to pass the face validity test...given how many women take apap during pregnancy, shouldn’t tons of kids have autism and ADHD?
Even if there does turn out to be some small connection, what would be a safer alternative PO med during pregnancy?