Originally posted by DocToBe:
Thanks a lot for the info Tim. What do you think about the idea of getting the Grant's Dissector/Atlas combo (and save a few bucks) and keep Netter's first edition (which has all of the plates of the 2nd edition except for the new ones you mentioned)?
Well, we used a first edition netter as a wet copy (kept with the cadaver)... Either way, Netter is REQUIRED in my mind. Grants is awful in comparison. No big dif between 1st and 2nd in my mind.
I DO need to get Grant's Dissector regardless of which atlas I use. Do you think having both atlases will be overkill? Or do you think it's worth it to get Netter's second edition and just use that?
If you're going to have two atlases, get NETTER (by far the best) and get Rohen & Yakochi (sp?) which is a photographic atlas, very very useful. it's a waste to get grants.
What did you think of Moore's Clinically Oriented Anatomy? I have to get a copy, and also Wier and Abrhams--An Imaging Atlas of Human Anatomy.
verbose. essentials of clinical anatomy is a decent book, though. get ridiculously simple! that's a great one (one of the only good ones of the series)
What do you think of the Color Atlas of Histology by Gardner and Hiatt and the Color Textbook of Histology by Gardner and Hiatt? My school says that it requires both... but as for the atlas we can choose between Wheaater and Gardner.
I liked Hiatt better than Wheater. The pics are sharper, and the explanations are stronger.
As for biochemistry--Is the Lipincott review book enough in your opinion? I've heard that if I know that cold I will be good for the boards--but as for my course, a large, more boring text is also listed--the Stryer book!
don't bother with stryer. lippincott is the best buy for this course. wait until the first few weeks of the course to see if anything else is necessary, but i would suspect that nothing else will be.