Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="IT514" data-source="post: 14654288" data-attributes="member: 171396">-How many sites you applied to (and how many were APA accredited)18 APA, 2 first-year VA sites not yet APA accredited.-How many interviews you received7-If you matched or not and to what type of siteMatched, #1 rank at a solid VA in the northeast-What type of sites you were applying to (research-focused, neuro, peds, etc)Haha. All neuro, half peds and half adult VA/AMC mix. Got zero peds interviews. My dissertation was with a gero population, so I'm not sure what I was thinking applying to peds sites. I'll agree with an above post that peds folks dont look kindly on those who are not all peds all the time. I can see why, and looking back I'm glad it worked out the way it did.-Other info that you think might be relevant to your outcome(s)One pub, 3 posters. Not much but first author and good quality. 1000 hours, 500 assessment and 500 therapy/cog rehab. I tend to interview very well, really knew my neuro stuff. I found the fact-finding type of interview questions to be enjoyable. I wrote a good personal essay. I applied to midwest, southeast, and northeast sites. All that aside, the process really sucks and calling it a cluster f is putting it nicely.</blockquote>

This thread is more than 6 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.