- Joined
- Feb 2, 2002
- Messages
- 1,152
- Reaction score
- 1
okay, so i know a lot of people don't believe in rankings. but anyways, i was looking at the methodology on usnews for the primary care rankings. and is it just me, or is the primary care rankings a load of crap!
basically the diff (besides some minor stuff) between the primary care rankings and the main rankings is that they use the percentage of m.d.'s that enter primary care residencies... so what?? if you get all 100% of your students to go to primary care, then you would be the #1 school?
at least research makes sense -- the best research schools will get the most NIH grants
it would be better imho if they ranked them based on other criteria, maybe strength of the affiliated hospitals, diversity of patients, etc. etc.
let me know if i'm way off-base here
basically the diff (besides some minor stuff) between the primary care rankings and the main rankings is that they use the percentage of m.d.'s that enter primary care residencies... so what?? if you get all 100% of your students to go to primary care, then you would be the #1 school?
at least research makes sense -- the best research schools will get the most NIH grants
it would be better imho if they ranked them based on other criteria, maybe strength of the affiliated hospitals, diversity of patients, etc. etc.
let me know if i'm way off-base here