Princeton Review Vs. AAMC prac tests

[oceanicF815]

Hi

Does anyone know of the difficulty comparison of the Princeton Review Tests vs. AAMC tests?

For example, I did a while bunch of AAMC tests, and on Bio I didn't score anything less than a 8, however on the PR test, I got a 6 in Bio.

I did feel it was a bit harder.

Anyone else have any thoughts?

---

Members don't see this ad.

 

[CodeBlu]

The Princeton Review tests are harder, not going to lie.

But, maybe you should focus on practicing some other passages instead of the AAMC passages. If you feel solid with content review, practice practice practice. You can definitely get a 10 in bio with decent problem solving skills and not having every little detail memorized.

Good luck! Hope you're enjoying the holiday!

 

[maybemed2013]

Bump.

 

[maybemed2013]

I would like to know how PR FL test compare to AAMCs FLs

 

[bigdogrob4284]

TPR full lengths are much harder than aamc's. My mcat was 34, AAMC average was 33.6, and my TPR average from 5 tests was like 26 I think.

 

[maybemed2013]

TPR full lengths are much harder than aamc's. My mcat was 34, AAMC average was 33.6, and my TPR average from 5 tests was like 26 I think.

Thanks really appreciated it.