I want to get other people's opinion on how they think the AAMC VR compares to Princeton and to EK verbal. I have both EK passages and Princeton passages that I am studying from. The EK 101 Passages seem to be less abstract and more opinion and fact-based whereas the Princeton VR seems to have questions which are more focused on details rather than the main idea. Does anyone agree/disagree with me? It doesn't surprise me that each prep company has passages that suit the strategy they preach, but I want to know which passages are more like the real thing?