Alright, so I remember how helpful these types pros and cons were for different schools for me when I was applying (even though most of them were dated 2007-2008), so I wanted to give back a bit of info SDN gave to me. Ill give my take on some of the schools I interviewed at.
First, I'll break down what I think the pros and cons of podiatry are and then move onto my school list. Ill bold my topics and break up by each school in a separate post, that way its easier for people to read. I'll give a brief thoughts, pros, then cons.
Podiatry:
The podiatry of today is not the podiatry of ten years ago, and you have the graduating classes of recent years to thank for this. Each year things are getting better for pods in terms of scope of practice, practice autonomy, income, prestige and recognition. This is a really good, under the radar field to go into with a bright future ahead of it if you can tolerate feet and being a foot and ankle surgeon; it doesn't have the problem of over saturation like dentistry, pharmacy, or optometry, and people need foot and ankle care done well. There is a big push for parity right now that students can get on the front lines and literally determine the trajectory of the profession in a very real way, and make a difference in the profession as a whole.
Pros
1) Improving at an increasing rate. Not exponential, but more at a "slow and steady" rate. The Pods of today are like the DOs in the 50s and early 60s, struggling (with success) to be recognized as physicians and surgeons within the medical community. The equity provider act in congress is a good example of this.
2) Resources are being dedicated to podiatry schools more than ever before for research and development.
3) Many schools are taught in conjunction with MD/DO schools. This further helps Podiatrists defend their physician status. If you take the same classes as the medical students and come from the same background, why wouldn't you be considered equal?
4) Podiatry fills a vital role in healthcare today. With the rise of diabetes, aging elderly, and general population growth, foot and ankle problems are becoming more prevalent. Whats most important however, is that podiatrists are willing to do some of the gross things for the feet that really need to be done, like wound care, Cyst drainage, and all the lovely smells associated with the feet.
5) Most of the students currently will make great advocates for the profession, and will take it to new heights. There were many current pod students on my interview day that are passionate about pushing the profession forward.
6) The introduction of the 3 year minimum residency training I feel is a good thing, as it gives pods more exposure. It is also the minimum residency training time for MD/DOs, further giving them
7) the residency problem is almost fixed.
Cons
1) Pods are still a long way from parity. Despite the gains, pods have an uphill battle that is going to be hard to fight. Pods don't take the USMLE and as such, there will always be a disparage between MD/DO vs DPM. Now, DOs don't necessarily take the USLME, but they are merging residencies, so things are looking up for them parity wise.
2) The leadership (at a professional level) and lobbying bodies leaves much to be desired.
3) The DPM degree as of right now, is currently seen as an inferior degree by some medical professionals in the healthcare community. I feel like this will get better in the long term (30+ years away).
4) Older DPMs tend to take advantage of the younger ones with salary and compensation offers that are atrocious by PA or Nurse Practitioner standards.
5) Cost of tuition, across all pod schools, are reaching ridiculous levels. This is not a podiatry only problem however.
6) One thing in general I really don't like is that pod schools are increasingly switching over to computerized testing measures instead of good old fashion paper exams. I dont like this because I like being able to write all over my exams and annotate in the corners to digest the information. Computer exams seem very sterile to me.
7) I wish pod schools did pass fail and not A-F grading.
Now, for the first school:
Kent State University College of Podiatric Medicine
Formerly Ohio College of Podiatric Medicine. Going into this school, I had very little expectations. I had preconceived notions that this was a bottom tiered school, that people go here because they had too. My reasoning behind this was because of their GPA and MCAT score ranges (They accepted people in the 2.0s and sub 20 MCAT). This place blew away all my expectations and I was thoroughly impressed with the program.
Pros:
1) The staff, teachers, and administrators as so friendly. They want you to be apart of the program and they bend over backward to accommodate you. I can only assume this goes for their students as well. Everyone is super approachable.
2) there are Supplemental instruction (SI) sessions for 1st year anatomy and biochem classes and tutoring available as well. This to me was a HUGE positive because SI was a massive benefit to be as an undergrad student.
3) the immediate area of Independence OH is really nice. Cleaveland is not.
4) there were research opportunities for students that were readily advertised. No other pod school brought up research opportunities on interview day.
5) Partnering with Kent State brings in a lot of benefits that a big state school has and was in my opinion, a small step in the right direction.
6) Anatomy Lab was very nice.
7) The students, at least at the interview, all seemed like they wanted to be there. This is interesting, as there were students at other schools who didn't seem to want to be pods.
8) From what I understood during the interview, rotations could all be done in one place, which is really nice.
9) They gave our interview group free Kent State apparel. That was sweet.
10) There was a really nice study area on the upper levels.
11) I really liked the little library.
12) The school is very aggressive in recruiting. I can't tell you how many fliers, folders, and papers they sent to me. I feel like the marketing could really help the profession.
Cons
1) the class size is too big. The school could be 100 students and it would still be fine.
2) I personally did not like the Cleveland area. It is a depressing area.
3) I wish they would accept higher caliber students, like screen at 3.0 GPA and 490 MCAT. I mean come on guys, a 3.0 in undergrad is easy, thats like all Bs, the occasional A and the occasional C.
4) I felt that the school run clinic was rather small and not really emphasized.
5) The board score pass rate was really low when I was interviewing (83 or something like that)
6) I wish the school was on Kent Sate University's campus proper instead of the old building. I feel like having a Podiatry school on college campuses would help attract students.