- Joined
- Mar 8, 2011
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 1
Last edited:
Would they be able to refer patients to one another? Thanks!
No. There's a law against it. Psychologists and psychiatrists if in the same office must draw pistols and shoot each other.
Seriously, I don't see why anyone would think there is a problem with both fields working together. The bottom line is both mental health professionals have different training and to work together in a complementary manner would only serve to make a better practice.
The only cons I see with working with psychologists and this would be true of anyone in any field is whenever you have multiple people in a team, some are idiots. You might be working with a guy who doesn't work well with you and that's not a psychiatry/psychology issue, but a human issue. The only other con I could see is someone, out if insecurity, might try to bring up some type of professional rivalry in an nonconstructive manner.
In general, I've found actually more frustration with psychiatrists as a whole vs psychologist as a whole, though I've seen idiots in both fields, just like there will be idiots everywhere.
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.
-Einstein
No. There's a law against it. Psychologists and psychiatrists if in the same office must draw pistols and shoot each other.
Seriously, I don't see why anyone would think there is a problem with both fields working together. The bottom line is both mental health professionals have different training and to work together in a complementary manner would only serve to make a better practice.
The only cons I see with working with psychologists and this would be true of anyone in any field is whenever you have multiple people in a team, some are idiots. You might be working with a guy who doesn't work well with you and that's not a psychiatry/psychology issue, but a human issue. The only other con I could see is someone, out if insecurity, might try to bring up some type of professional rivalry in an nonconstructive manner.
In general, I've found actually more frustration with psychiatrists as a whole vs psychologist as a whole, though I've seen idiots in both fields, just like there will be idiots everywhere.
Is it possible for a psychiatrist to share a practice with a psychologist? If so, what are the pros and cons of being a psychiatrist in that scenario? Would they be able to refer patients to one another? Thanks!
This may lead you as a psychiatrist to stop doing therapy which is detrimental in the long run to the patient, even if you are referring them to a therapist.
Two people doing psychotherapy makes things complicated. If this is being done, both should at least touch base to make sure they're not undermining the other's work.
It's pretty much the same whenever there's too many people involved. I got plenty of patients and I don't know WTF their PCP is doing. I got a guy for example, and each time he's been in my office, his BP has been over 180/100. I tell the guy he needs a BP med, but I can't provide it because I'm his psychiatrist. Then he tells me his PCP tells him not to worry about hypertension. The guy's only been in my office 10 times now, and when I take his BP, he insists he is calm. Like I said, the problem is not that the other doctor is a PCP, it's that the PCP is not working within the guidelines.
not quite sure why you are checking BP so often but they are in the range of a hypertensive crisis and if they have any organ system involvement its a medical emergency.
but they are in the range of a hypertensive crisis and if they have any organ system involvement its a medical emergency. Thats if it happens once, you say its happened 10 out of 10 times
If you are and can do therapy, its better in the long run than 2 people doing individual things. Its also better for the healthcare economics.
Thats not what I meant and I agree that we should work with the therapists. BTW, I hope there is more to the HTN story...not quite sure why you are checking BP so often but they are in the range of a hypertensive crisis and if they have any organ system involvement its a medical emergency. Thats if it happens once, you say its happened 10 out of 10 times. I think you are a better doc than that and wouldn't make such a huge mistake so I hope you are just making a story up.
Anyways. If I am following someone for bipolar disorder and they need more intensive psychotherapy, I refer them. But in the end, they are going to follow with me for years so I am going to do a lot of therapy. It is always good to refer and do that with expectations and communication. If I have already tried CBT, I don't want to have them do it again etc and if they are doing CBT I don't want to sabotage it. I would probably limit myself to supportive therapy at that point.
But perhaps your post made my point. People get afraid, risk averse and so they just stop doing what they are good at. If you are and can do therapy, its better in the long run than 2 people doing individual things. Its also better for the healthcare economics.
SBP of 180 is hypertensive urgency.
True.
But I did tell the patient of the risk, and the patient did have the capacity to make a decision that he did not want to go to the hospital.
I mentioned the incident because it was of extreme frustration to me.
...mentioned erectile dysfunction... beating the dead horse...
Whopper, I didn't realize you were so psychodynamic.
Originally Posted by whopper
...mentioned erectile dysfunction... beating the dead horse...
His name is whopper not whooper, unless my computer is showing something odd.
This thread has been fully hijacked...twice.
I think most of us agree that it's great for a psychiatrist and psychologist to work closely together.
Getting back to the OP, anyone with any experience with a psychiatrist hiring a psychologist in a private practice setting? Can a psychiatrist and psychologist legally share a (private) practice??
Well, I have psychologists and other therapists that work for our group as employees but they aren't partners. The partners in the mental health group are all psychiatrists. So I am not sure if that answers your question. The psychiatrists are all able to cover for each other etc which the therapists couldn't do so I guess from that standpoint they can't legally share but I suppose they could legally have shares in the corporation. In our case that would be a mess with respect to division of profits and productivity so we choose not to do it but I suppose it could be done.