• Pharmacy Job Market Webinar - Starting at 8 PM

    Are you considering applying to pharmacy school but are concerned about job prospects when you graduate? Hear from three PharmDs about their experiences and options outside of retail pharmacy!

toby jones

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jan 8, 2007
548
2
Status (Visible)
I finally managed to wade my way through 'Affect Regulation and the Origin of the Self: The Neurobology of Emotional Development'.

Do we have any cognitive psychologists posting here? (I don't mean cognitive therapists, I mean cognitive psychologists).

What I'm wondering is...

How do you reconcile psychodynamic structures / processes with cognitive psychological structures / processes?

Sometimes we can do a little bit of a hierarchy like this:

Biology
Chemistry
Physics

Where (so to speak) once God fixed the facts of physics the facts of chemistry and biology were fixed for free. It wasn't that on day one he fixed the facts of physics and on day two he fixed the facts of chemistry etc.

Is pychodynamic theory at the same level as cognitive psychology (hence they could be genuine rivals) or is it higher level (where the facts of psychodynamic theory are fixed by the facts at the cognitive psychological level)? Of course cognitive psychology is far from complete, but I hope you get the notion that I'm gesturing towards some idealised 'final science' when it is complete.

I found this a while back:

http://arts.adelaide.edu.au/humanit...s/Dispensing_with_the_Dynamic_Unconscious.pdf

I agree with the authors conclusion that cognitive psychology HAS NOT vindicated the dynamic unconscious. Then the issue becomes 'how crucial is the dynamic unconscious for psychodynamic theory'? Because maybe psychodynamic theory could simply dispense with it too...

I'd be interested in peoples thoughts.
 
About the Ads

toby jones

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jan 8, 2007
548
2
Status (Visible)
I meant to post this to the clinical/PhD board because Megan told me to go read Schore and now I've done just that and wanted to chat about it...

I'm a little surprised that people here don't like to think...

But remembering back to undergraduate psychology...

I'm not all that surprised really.

Sigh.
 
5

50960

It is just that we work all day dealing with real world people with big real-world problems and use our brains to try and treat them. You post is legit and someone may want to engage you if you post it in a place where psychologists, particularly academics can respond.
 

toby jones

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jan 8, 2007
548
2
Status (Visible)
> someone may want to engage you if you post it in a place where psychologists, particularly academics can respond.[/quote]

To repeat:

> I meant to post this to the clinical/PhD board

Can I move my post or do I need to formerly request that a moderator do that?
 
5

50960

Just repost your ? there....but they are all still students. This is not an academic think tank by any means...
 

toby jones

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Jan 8, 2007
548
2
Status (Visible)
thanks, i will repost. i wasn't sure whether a repost would be considered 'spamming the boards'.

> they are all still students.

thats okay, i'm a student too. i didn't think that JUST students were posting... but i've had some good theoretical discussion / debate over there already. this was kind of continuing on past themes really.

thanks.
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 14 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.