Search
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Menu
Forums
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Search forums
Members
Articles
Interviews
Professions
Rehab Sciences
Dental
Medical
Pharmacy
Podiatry
Optometry
Psychology
Veterinary
Resources
Interview Feedback
Essay Workshop
Application Cost Calculator
MD Applicants
DDS Applicants
LizzyM Application Assistant
Moonlighting.org
About
About the Ads
Our History
How We Moderate
Vision, Values and Policies
Support for Black Lives Matter
Log in
Register
Search
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums
Popular Categories
Pre-medical
Medical Student
Dental (DDS/DMD)
Optometry
Pharmacy
Physical Therapy
Other Links
Members
New posts
trending
Search forums
Support SDN
Donate
Contact us
Main Links
Forums
Articles
Interviews
Professions
Fields
Dental
Medical
Optometry
Pharmacy
Podiatry
Psychology
Rehab Sciences
Veterinary
Support SDN
Donate
Contact us
Main Links
Forums
Articles
Interviews
Resources
Applicants
MD Applicants
DDS Applicants
LizzyM Application Assistant
Application Cost Calculator
Essay Workshop
Interview Feedback
SDN Wiki
Other Resources
Glossary
Medical Specialty Selector
Scutwork
StudySchedule
Review2
Support SDN
Donate
Contact us
Main Links
Forums
Articles
Interviews
About
Organization
Our History
Vision, Values and Policies
How We Moderate
Newsroom
About the Ads
Help
Support Us
Become a Partner
Sponsor SDN
Donate to SDN
Writing for SDN
Support SDN
Donate
Contact us
Main Links
Forums
Articles
Interviews
What's new
New posts
Latest activity
Search forums
Members
Forums
Research Forums
Physician Scientists
publications necessary?
Reply to thread
Search
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Search engine:
XenForo Search
Threadloom Search
Search titles only
By:
Install the app
Install
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
About the Ads
Message
<blockquote data-quote="atsai3" data-source="post: 363925" data-attributes="member: 13140"><p>The fact that you have publications is not supposed to be an indication of your future career. (Primarily.) At this stage of your life, all it basically means is that you can do research, and you can do it well enough to get published.</p><p></p><p>Many MD/PhD students choose a certain course of research during their "in between" PhD years that has almost nothing to do with their clinical interest. For example, suppose after you finish 2 years of medical school you're really interested in biochemistry, metabolism, and diabetes. You then spend another 3-5 years writing your dissertation in this area. Then you go back to medical school, decide that internal medicine is not for you, and go for radiology. (And this happens quite a lot. There's nothing that helps you with your decisionmaking more than actually *doing* time on the wards.)</p><p></p><p>If this happense, the PhD isn't *useless*. The PhD portion of your training is as much about putting together a toolbox of methods (that you can use to apply elsewhere, if you decide to go in another direction) as it is about putting together an area of expertise.</p><p></p><p>The other thing arguing for the PhD portion of the MD/PhD being about putting together a toolbox is because by the time you finish your clinical training, you will be at least 5 years (2 medical school+3 residency) from picking up your research agenda again. That's a lot of time. Things change.</p><p></p><p>This is just a long winded way of saying that you don't need to worry that your publications are in different fields. They won't take it as a sign of wishy-washy-ness, but rather that you are capable enough to publish in a variety of disciplines. It's way too early for them to &gt;expect&lt; that much of a focus.</p><p></p><p>Cheers,</p><p>-a.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="atsai3, post: 363925, member: 13140"] The fact that you have publications is not supposed to be an indication of your future career. (Primarily.) At this stage of your life, all it basically means is that you can do research, and you can do it well enough to get published. Many MD/PhD students choose a certain course of research during their "in between" PhD years that has almost nothing to do with their clinical interest. For example, suppose after you finish 2 years of medical school you're really interested in biochemistry, metabolism, and diabetes. You then spend another 3-5 years writing your dissertation in this area. Then you go back to medical school, decide that internal medicine is not for you, and go for radiology. (And this happens quite a lot. There's nothing that helps you with your decisionmaking more than actually *doing* time on the wards.) If this happense, the PhD isn't *useless*. The PhD portion of your training is as much about putting together a toolbox of methods (that you can use to apply elsewhere, if you decide to go in another direction) as it is about putting together an area of expertise. The other thing arguing for the PhD portion of the MD/PhD being about putting together a toolbox is because by the time you finish your clinical training, you will be at least 5 years (2 medical school+3 residency) from picking up your research agenda again. That's a lot of time. Things change. This is just a long winded way of saying that you don't need to worry that your publications are in different fields. They won't take it as a sign of wishy-washy-ness, but rather that you are capable enough to publish in a variety of disciplines. It's way too early for them to >expect< that much of a focus. Cheers, -a. [/QUOTE]
This thread is more than 18 years old.
Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:
Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Research Forums
Physician Scientists
publications necessary?
Top
Bottom