- Joined
- Nov 12, 2007
- Messages
- 146
- Reaction score
- 0
i know this has been asked several times before, but I had a more specific question about the topic. i'm not sure if your state schools have this, but mine has a program called Running Start- where you have the option of taking classes at a community college your JR and/or SR yr of high school. I chose this pathway and did pretty well, most of the time, @ the community college. My question is in regards to the time I didn't do "so well". I had a death in my family winter qtr of my senior year (2nd year @ com. college), and my grades suffered. Up until that point, I had a 3.9 CUM. I was able to obtain a hardship withdrawal from one of my professors who was familiar with my work, but, same case scenario didn't apply with my other professors. They gave me the option to appeal the grade (1.0 in a 200-level phil course, 2.3 in a 100-level biol course), but due to extenuating circumstances, I didn't have the energy or time to go through all the paper work. I just accepted those 2 (mortifying) grades. Spring qtr, i took time off from school- i graduated high school, and began at the University of Washington the following fall. I have done well throughout (my cum is 3.76 @ UW) but as i am beginning to think about the application process, I am extremely concerned about my quarter of incompetence. I know many students say that 1 qtr is NOT that big of a deal, and the important thing is the upward trend, but i feel that this one qtr will prevent me from being accepted into a lot of medical schools. I'm a bit torn whether or not I should explain the "bad grades" in my personal statement. my adviser told me it might be beneficial to talk about the experience in order to gain a sympathetic audience, however, i feel that reiterating my bad grades will only emphasize the negative point in my academic career. kind of like when you're reading a well-written story, you may or may not notice that one spelling error on pg 54, but if the author were to say, "hey, did you notice my big as$ blop on pg 54?", you would unlikely miss it.
so i guess the root of my question is this: if you were in my position, would or wouldn't you explain it?
so i guess the root of my question is this: if you were in my position, would or wouldn't you explain it?