I'm always fascinated by many students who believe if it is not going to help me get a higher board score, then it's a waste of their time. They obviously have forgotten why they want to become a physician. These students appear to want to be the physician I choose to take care of my Mother in Law.
While I understand this attitude from some old school attendings, I believe it to be kind of disingenuous. Ultimately when it comes time to apply for residency which can result in a complete change of career trajectories for students, a few extra percentiles on STEP can arguably be the best bang for your buck to have on your resume.
With regards to "they have forgotten why they want to be a physician", in all honesty they cannot worry about their idealistic goals when the very real threat of going unmatched is hanging over their heads. I don't mean any offense, but I'm sure most of those students have matching in their desired specialty/program as a higher priority than "being the kind of physician you'd want for your mother in law". Because quite frankly STEP has more power to determine their destiny than you do in many cases.
The reality is that many clinical professors nowadays are detached from the process and they don't realize that students arent properly rewarded for putting forth effort. There are stories posted on here time and time again of students who go the extra mile only to get the same cut and paste eval and rec letters as everyone else. STEP isn't like this, generally if you do the studying, and put forth the effort you get a score above your peers to show for it.
And just to address the other scenario, like I mentioned even if those students are rewarded with better evals or rec letters, they often still end up as secondary to their STEP in terms of weightage on their residency apps.
As cynical and/or defeatist as it may sound, in my mind this is not a case of fault on the students. It is a classic case of don't hate the players, hate the game.
edit: very much agree with the way
@Billiam95 put it "this is simply students responding to incentives".
In my eyes its almost cruel to expect students to act differently unless the critic is making a good faith push to change the incentives. In the simplest sense med school is
school, why would you expect students to divert time from something that is a huge portion of their
grade as a residency applicant to something worth much less.