rabidpanda13

10+ Year Member
Nov 24, 2008
165
0
the dirty south
Status (Visible)
  1. Pre-Medical
I have looked all over their website and I cannot find what their avg GPA and MCAT is. I'm sure someone here knows.

Did anyone else enjoy the alliteration in the title as much as me?
 

RoadRunner17

Fleet of feet
Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
May 12, 2007
2,802
3
Status (Visible)
On one of the sheets they gave out at the interview, average MCAT was 34.1, average sGPA was 3.52, average cGPA was 3.61. These averages are for the entering class. You will be able to find the averages for the accepted applicants in the MSAR.
 

mmmcdowe

Duke of minimal vowels
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
10+ Year Member
Sep 13, 2008
9,856
1,799
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
On one of the sheets they gave out at the interview, average MCAT was 34.1, average sGPA was 3.52, average cGPA was 3.61. These averages are for the entering class. You will be able to find the averages for the accepted applicants in the MSAR.

I think its interesting that their MCAT is so high, but their GPA is so low...
 
About the Ads

RoadRunner17

Fleet of feet
Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
May 12, 2007
2,802
3
Status (Visible)
I think its interesting that their MCAT is so high, but their GPA is so low...

I think it might have to do at least in part with the new curriculum they have there and the kind of students they are looking for. Can't really say for sure, but I am definitely bringing down their average GPA figures (though to my credit, I'm bringing up that average MCAT).
 

chiz2kul

t.roll.ed for Banning
10+ Year Member
May 22, 2008
848
2
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Hmmm idk but i know that my MCAT was no where near that average, but my GPA was higher tho...and I got in
 

smeagol

10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Jan 4, 2007
457
0
Status (Visible)
I think its interesting that their MCAT is so high, but their GPA is so low...

That is kind of interesting.

Maybe they take in a lot of locals in the midwest where grade inflation isn't as much of a problem as it is at my University.
 

aebvd97

10+ Year Member
Oct 22, 2008
361
0
Nashville, TN
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
Certainly a science GPA average of 3.52 is a bit low, given that the average matriculant in 2008 had a 3.70 sGPA, but the cGPA isn't really low, with their's being 0.05 under the average.
 

alibai3ah

10+ Year Member
5+ Year Member
Aug 24, 2008
1,422
2
Status (Visible)
  1. Pre-Medical
I think its interesting that their MCAT is so high, but their GPA is so low...

Case Western is notorious for that.....they love high MCATers, so to all the kids with lower gpa, high mcat apply here...
 

mmmcdowe

Duke of minimal vowels
Staff member
Administrator
Volunteer Staff
10+ Year Member
Sep 13, 2008
9,856
1,799
Status (Visible)
  1. Resident [Any Field]
So the admissions folk contacted me today after reading this post (Director Essman recognized me). He was nice enough to write to me about it, and I figured I'd post it here for people to read.

We also find it a bit interesting that our gpa was a little lower than a national average while our MCAT score is well-above the national average. In looking at our matriculant data, it would appear that this is a function of the fact that CWRU has a reputation for attracting interesting, non-traditional students. Many times we see that these non-traditional applicants did not major in the sciences in undergrad and/or had lower gpas. Later in their life when they've decided to pursue a career in medicine they take post-bacc or graduate course work and usually do exceptionally well. Unfortunately, post-bacc/graduate course work isn't always factored into the AMCAS cumulative and science gpas that are reported to the AAMC statistic database. On the flip side, many of the non-trads rock the MCAT once they've completed their post-bacc work which is reflected in our MCAT average.
 

amph119

10+ Year Member
Oct 20, 2007
1,784
3
Status (Visible)
  1. Medical Student
So the admissions folk contacted me today after reading this post (Director Essman recognized me). He was nice enough to write to me about it, and I figured I'd post it here for people to read.

We also find it a bit interesting that our gpa was a little lower than a national average while our MCAT score is well-above the national average. In looking at our matriculant data, it would appear that this is a function of the fact that CWRU has a reputation for attracting interesting, non-traditional students. Many times we see that these non-traditional applicants did not major in the sciences in undergrad and/or had lower gpas. Later in their life when they've decided to pursue a career in medicine they take post-bacc or graduate course work and usually do exceptionally well. Unfortunately, post-bacc/graduate course work isn't always factored into the AMCAS cumulative and science gpas that are reported to the AAMC statistic database. On the flip side, many of the non-trads rock the MCAT once they've completed their post-bacc work which is reflected in our MCAT average.

Haha, Christian is so cool. :]
 

RoadRunner17

Fleet of feet
Moderator Emeritus
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
May 12, 2007
2,802
3
Status (Visible)
No reason to be - both Mr. Essman and Dr. Mehta are great people, they are definitely enthusiastic about Case!
 

doctor712

Membership Revoked
Removed
10+ Year Member
Nov 14, 2008
1,871
2
Status (Visible)
Dear Director Essman,

It is with pleasure that I read of your interest in Student Doctor's Network. As a non-traditional student with a low ancient GPA and soon to be high MCAT, I write in the fervent hope that you will look at my MDApps and accept me, in advance, to your class of 2015. :thumbup:

How about an interview? I'll buy lunch. :D:D

Signed,
Doctor 712
 
About the Ads
This thread is more than 12 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

  1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
  2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
  5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
  6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
  7. This thread is locked.