- Joined
- Aug 23, 2014
- Messages
- 3,264
- Reaction score
- 6,612
From the latest issue of The Beam by Paul Wallner and Brian Davis:
Perhaps the most significant issue raised by discussions with stakeholder organizations has been the relative emphasis currently placed on the three elements of IC, especially the weighting of the basic sciences. Current exam structure includes one exam in physics comprising approximately 100 items, and a second biology exam of similar length. These exams are administered on the same day and residents are eligible to sit for the exams after 32 months of residency training. The clinical exam, which comprises approximately 200 items, is administered on a second day, and residents must have completed their entire 48-month training period before being eligible to sit for this exam. The relevance and weighting of the physics and biology exams has been raised as a concern, especially by younger physicians within the discipline. Consistent with input from stakeholder organizations, the ABR trustees believe that any de-emphasis of science within the RO curriculum, training programs, and assessment instruments would have potentially significant impact on the current and future science and practice of radiation oncology. They are encouraging initiation of a broad stakeholder dialogue to explore the impact of these issues and to make recommendations for the path forward.(Emphasis mine)
Obligatory 'OK boomer.'
why does PW’s opinion continue to have so much weight in our field? This is crazy