- Joined
- Dec 17, 2007
- Messages
- 3,381
- Reaction score
- 4,387
Hello everybody.
Standard treatment would be hockey-stick (dog-leg) radiotherapy to 30 Gy for Stage IIA and 36 Gy for Stage IIB disease.
In the Roach handbook an approach is described with 25,5 Gy hockey-stick (dog-leg) + Boost to macroscopic disease up to 30/36 Gy.
This approach is clearly based on the experience gained by the MRC trial, which demonstrated that lower radiation doses (20 Gy) are sufficient to control microscopic disease in Stage I seminoma.
To the best of my knowledge there have been no trials or publications, which showed that the mentioned approach in the Roach handbook is also safe for Stage II seminoma. All trials on Stage II disease did 30/36 Gy upfront hockey-stick (dog-leg).
Two questions:
1. Does anyone know of a trial in Stage II disease that tried the Roach approach?
2. How many of you do hockey-stick (dog-leg) 20-25,5 Gy and then boost macroscopic disease to 30/36 Gy and how many do upfront hockey-stick (dog-leg) 30/36 Gy?
Standard treatment would be hockey-stick (dog-leg) radiotherapy to 30 Gy for Stage IIA and 36 Gy for Stage IIB disease.
In the Roach handbook an approach is described with 25,5 Gy hockey-stick (dog-leg) + Boost to macroscopic disease up to 30/36 Gy.
This approach is clearly based on the experience gained by the MRC trial, which demonstrated that lower radiation doses (20 Gy) are sufficient to control microscopic disease in Stage I seminoma.
To the best of my knowledge there have been no trials or publications, which showed that the mentioned approach in the Roach handbook is also safe for Stage II seminoma. All trials on Stage II disease did 30/36 Gy upfront hockey-stick (dog-leg).
Two questions:
1. Does anyone know of a trial in Stage II disease that tried the Roach approach?
2. How many of you do hockey-stick (dog-leg) 20-25,5 Gy and then boost macroscopic disease to 30/36 Gy and how many do upfront hockey-stick (dog-leg) 30/36 Gy?