Recent test takes: Is Geometry and Trig still on the test?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

flossit

Full Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Jan 30, 2015
Messages
221
Reaction score
23
Can anyone shed light if those two are still being tested directly?

Members don't see this ad.
 
I know 2 friends who have just taken the DAT this past month and they both said they didn't have 1 question on trig or geometry


Sent from my iPhone using SDN mobile
 
Members don't see this ad :)
They are phasing trig out but I don't think it was supposed to be gone until the 3 quarter (i.e. after June). That is what I heard, but that is not necessarily true.
 
Definitely got geometry questions with 30-60-90 triangles, isosceles triangles and such. Don't remember any outstanding trig questions, maybe 1, at most 2. I was expecting some hard trig questions from doing BC and glancing through destroyer 2015 ed. but trig didn't show up as a problem at all. Got these interpret graph questions that showed up in BC math, at least 4 or 5. I'd say do the BC math until scoring 21s couple times then you're golden. I took mine 5-24-17.
 
Definitely got geometry questions with 30-60-90 triangles, isosceles triangles and such. Don't remember any outstanding trig questions, maybe 1, at most 2. I was expecting some hard trig questions from doing BC and glancing through destroyer 2015 ed. but trig didn't show up as a problem at all. Got these interpret graph questions that showed up in BC math, at least 4 or 5. I'd say do the BC math until scoring 21s couple times then you're golden. I took mine 5-24-17.

Are these new QC questions difficult?
 
Are these new QC questions difficult?
I think it's best to take the subject specific QC on BC. It helped me extremely because once I encountered those QC problems, I knew exactly what they were asking for and how to think it through. There were also lots of simple data interpretation questions. I had no trig, but a couple of geometry questions. And some geometry stuff were included in the actual QC problem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Are these new QC questions difficult?

No, they were pretty common sense to me, just have to be careful while rushing, if that makes sense.
I think BC quant is enough to prepare you. So much of the DAT is a time crunch, and QC is definitely an example of that. I did all of destroyer problems for fun as a break from studying for ochem and bio, then did BC tests until I could consistently score above 20 and finish on time. If you could do that like 2 or 3 times in a row on BC QC tests, I think you're more than ready for QC. I got a 24 on QC and were iffy in a few questions still studying this way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
I think it's best to take the subject specific QC on BC. It helped me extremely because once I encountered those QC problems, I knew exactly what they were asking for and how to think it through. There were also lots of simple data interpretation questions. I had no trig, but a couple of geometry questions. And some geometry stuff were included in the actual QC problem.

I wonder these data interpretation questions, where can I find examples of them, does bootcamp have any similar questions on their tests?
Do they give you a pie chart or a table to interpret?
 
I wonder these data interpretation questions, where can I find examples of them, does bootcamp have any similar questions on their tests?
Do they give you a pie chart or a table to interpret?
It's like bar graphs, pie charts, ect. These are easy points! It would ask you to add up all the people and stuff.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Hi just wondering how you thought the difficult of the QC from bootcamp compared to the actualy DAT? I am finding the QC questions on bootcamp very hard even when i compare it to GRE questions
 
I felt like the DAT was a bit easier than Bootcamp due to having more of the new QR types. They felt more like a logical reasoning question rather than a math problem.

I did see trig and geometry, but I took the DAT in the first half of 2017.
 
Top