Ok, yes, I agree with most of your points about the 10 max thing, UCLAMAN. I did not mean that it should be a max for everyone. My comment was misleading.
I only speak from my own personal experience, which of course is limited. Most of my friends applied to about 10-20 schools. I myself applied to 15 (which is what my pre-med advisor recommended). He did not recommend more than 20 for anyone. Everyone I knew who took the honors sequence with me and was doing well got accepted. I go to a fairly good undergrad, but I don't know how much of a difference that really makes. A friend of mine who was probably running upwards to a 3.9 and got a 40mcat applied to 6 schools and got accepted to all, WL at 1. So they say hindsight is 20/20... but among the people in my pre-med class that I know personally, I feel like I could have predicted among them would get accepted, who would be WL and who would either wait a year or not get accepted, knowing what I know now about the whole process.
Some people I know who took the regular science sequence (and I don't know how well they did, but they seemed like decent students, although I only knew them from the vast extracurric's they did) applied to 20, 30+ schools. Ok, so I know 3 of them. And none of them got in (1 is on 3 WLs). It pains me to think of how painful it must be for the person who chucks out the $$$ for that many applications (not to mention the work involved). To me, if you were really that unsure of your chances, why not take a year off and get more confident? I'm curious, why did you apply to that many schools, UCLAMAN? I'm not assuming you had bad stats (b/c I don't know), but I am assuming that you just went overboard on the pre-med anal mentality and that you had lots of $$$ to burn.
A few reach schools is good, but there are enough numbers for you to calculate a fairly accurate probability of your acceptance at a particular school... based upon numbers, extracurric's, interview personality, CONNECTIONS, time you turned in your apps, etc (just like you're saying). And why apply to ANY schools you can't see yourself going to? I myself am very picky about where I want to live.
As for me, I have no idea why I applied to some of the places I applied to when I submitted my primaries. Reading the MSAR definitely does not qualify as "researching schools". It definitely made it hard to write the BS on some of those secondaries. And unless you have something truly amazing (or an amazing connection to someone in the school) that sets you apart, follow the advice the schools send with the secondary apps. (I feel now that I was forewarned.) Because, if a school gets upward to 9000 apps for a 150 member class and you are not close to avg for them, and they don't see that amazing thing about you on your primary, they've most likely already put your app in the "no unless something amazing" pile and are just waiting for your packet to arrive so they can cash your check and throw away the rest. This scenario gets exponentially worse with every passing day of the whole application process. And you can tell from other people's experiences which schools have set gpa/mcat cutoffs and which don't (and of course these can always be trumped by connections... notice a recurring theme?).
Alright, this rant must be boring you by now, so enough about that topic.
As for the trial form... I mostly used it for my grades, since it is in a very different format from my transcript, and it was just easier for me to not have to keep searching through my transcript for everything. Plus, instead of handling several different papers while input-ing the data, you just have that one packet. And I wanted to get the whole thing done in one day (except for the PS, which took almost a month).
Anyway... I hope it's at least helpful that you get different perspectives. Best of luck!
Nat