D
deleted861354
Hello:
I am interested in applying to MFT and LPC programs in the Bay Area. There are a few programs I'm interested in that are accredited not by the national body (CACREP/COAMFTE) but they are accredited by a regional body (e.g. the Wright Institute is WASC accredited) and on California's Board of Licensure's list of programs that "meet state licensure requirements."
My question is:
For both obtaining an internship and being a marketable candidate for group practices and institutional settings, what is the difference between going a school that is COAMFTE/CACREP accredited vs. regionally accredited?
Thank you for your time.
I am interested in applying to MFT and LPC programs in the Bay Area. There are a few programs I'm interested in that are accredited not by the national body (CACREP/COAMFTE) but they are accredited by a regional body (e.g. the Wright Institute is WASC accredited) and on California's Board of Licensure's list of programs that "meet state licensure requirements."
My question is:
For both obtaining an internship and being a marketable candidate for group practices and institutional settings, what is the difference between going a school that is COAMFTE/CACREP accredited vs. regionally accredited?
Thank you for your time.