- Joined
- Feb 18, 2014
- Messages
- 283
- Reaction score
- 91
In taking a retrospective look at my undergraduate research career, I have been questioning whether I would consider myself significantly productive. For some reason, the only criteria that immediately came to mind was publications. I am wondering what you all think about this. Are there other ways to truly measure productivity? Of course, one may have done graduate level/ consistent work, only to be disappointed with negative results in the end, so surely, there have to be other ways of looking at it. Poster presentations are next in the hierarchy, but even for that, anyone can easily make a poster, so we're back at my initial point.
Anyways, just curious for some feedback.
Anyways, just curious for some feedback.