Hello everyone,
Anyone that read the article would care to share their opinion ? Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia
I am having a hard time understanding the meaning of the result of the study
" This large randomized clinical trial performed in patients undergoing anesthesia with RSI failed to demonstrate the noninferiority of the sham procedure in preventing pulmonary aspiration"?
Are the results saying that the sham procedure (no cricoid pressure) are inferior when compared to cricoid pressure, therefore the sham procedure has an increase risk of pulmonary aspiration during RSI vs cricoid pressure ?
Anyone that read the article would care to share their opinion ? Cricoid Pressure Compared With a Sham Procedure in Rapid Sequence Induction of Anesthesia
I am having a hard time understanding the meaning of the result of the study
" This large randomized clinical trial performed in patients undergoing anesthesia with RSI failed to demonstrate the noninferiority of the sham procedure in preventing pulmonary aspiration"?
Are the results saying that the sham procedure (no cricoid pressure) are inferior when compared to cricoid pressure, therefore the sham procedure has an increase risk of pulmonary aspiration during RSI vs cricoid pressure ?