- Joined
- May 9, 2007
- Messages
- 369
- Reaction score
- 2
So at this point, many of you (like me) are no doubt in the process of scratching out the last little bits of pathos and logos meant justify our existence to adcoms on secondary applications.
When I was doing the AMCAS PS, I had a gang of readers and editors, most of whom were reading for content. I did something like 4-5 major revisions, and then sent it off with nothing even close to a misty eye. In producing this monumental and Grammy Award winning piece, I felt like I'd pretty well calibrated my writing style for the secondaries. As such, I have done little to no revision (content or otherwise) on most of the secondaries I've sent out.
I'm wondering: how much revision all of you are giving your secondaries?
When I was doing the AMCAS PS, I had a gang of readers and editors, most of whom were reading for content. I did something like 4-5 major revisions, and then sent it off with nothing even close to a misty eye. In producing this monumental and Grammy Award winning piece, I felt like I'd pretty well calibrated my writing style for the secondaries. As such, I have done little to no revision (content or otherwise) on most of the secondaries I've sent out.
I'm wondering: how much revision all of you are giving your secondaries?