Rohen's for neuroanatomy?

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

HPSPpayissue

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
22
Reaction score
0

Members don't see this ad.
My friends used Rohen's to study for Gross, and they are planning to use it for nueroanatomy too. Is it worth it for me to get one for nueroanatomy practical exam?
 

cpants

Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2007
Messages
2,749
Reaction score
443
If you don't already have one, and you are already done with gross, I definitely wouldn't waste the money.

2 reasons:
1. If you want to use it, they definitely will have multiple copies in the library.
2. If you want to buy something, your money would probably be better spent on a good neuro atlas which incorporates pictures. Ask at the bookstore. Keep in mind these can be found for free in your library as well.
 

TMP-SMX

Senior Member
Moderator Emeritus
15+ Year Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2006
Messages
3,839
Reaction score
184
Rohen isn't that useful for neuro. The thing about neuro is pathways which you just can't see grossly. Get an actual neuro atlas that should include that information also.
 

Jccripe

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Sep 12, 2006
Messages
469
Reaction score
0
The Hanes atlas is pretty unbeatable; you could also use the neuro HY
 

grandslam521

Junior Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2006
Messages
97
Reaction score
0
Do not waste your money on Rohen for neuroanatomy! You could easily find general, gross pictures of the brain online for free. However, you should definitly buy Haines especially if your course requires you to identify structures on brain/spinal cord sections.
 

nogolfinsnow

Full Member
10+ Year Member
7+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2007
Messages
711
Reaction score
29
Duane Haines is the way to go, and he has the best name of any textbook author.
 

Yakko

Full Member
10+ Year Member
Joined
Nov 9, 2007
Messages
53
Reaction score
0
I'd look over Rohens for major gyri/sulci and such for practical exams. It's pretty good. It was nice to review stuff in color. Haines was usually the bulk when it came to learning tracts/nuclei, though.
 
Top