- Joined
- Feb 24, 2015
- Messages
- 866
- Reaction score
- 766
I am lucky enough to be holding acceptances to several great schools. At this point, I'm trying to decide between Rush, Loyola, and USC Keck. My heart is telling me to go with Rush, as it felt like the best fit and Chicago is far and away the best situation for my fiance, but I feel like I may be making a mistake passing up an offer from a well respected/recognized school such as Keck. From some perusals of the boards here, it seems Rush and Loyola are similarly respected so that choice would come down to personal preference/financial aid. I want to do primary care pediatrics, so nothing too competitive, but do want to attend residency or at least ultimately practice in Oregon, my home state. Seeking any and all advice on whether I would be mistaken to pick Rush over Keck.
Rush Pros:
- location (fiance's current company has an office in Chicago, he wouldn't need to find a new job)
- social situation (we have friends in Chicago, including fiance's best friend, as well as his extended family)
- I have a family friend/mentor who is very involved at Rush (very well respected professor, involved in many aspects of the school --> great letter of rec)
- Commitment to service/easy to get involved
- Affiliation with Cook County --> excellent clinical education
- No required research (I hate research)
- I loved every person I met there
- New curriculum/flipped classroom/NO lecture time
Rush Cons:
- weather (I'm a west coast girl who has been in Minneapolis for several years for my fiance -- sooo over the winters)
- limited financial aid/high CoA
- far from my family
- new curriculum (our class would be guinea pigs)
Keck Pros:
- West Coast location; my favorite uncle/aunt/cousin live in LA; direct flight to my hometown in OR
- the. weather.
- better opportunities for west coast residencies
- affiliation with LAC; excellent clinical education
- commitment to service
- more well known/higher ranked
Keck Cons:
- totally transplanting our lives - fiance would need to find a new job, new social circle
- very expensive CoA and cost of living
- required research all 4 years (big for me)
- did not connect with the students there as well as at Rush/didn't feel as at home
- more traditional curriculum/lots of lecture time
Rush Pros:
- location (fiance's current company has an office in Chicago, he wouldn't need to find a new job)
- social situation (we have friends in Chicago, including fiance's best friend, as well as his extended family)
- I have a family friend/mentor who is very involved at Rush (very well respected professor, involved in many aspects of the school --> great letter of rec)
- Commitment to service/easy to get involved
- Affiliation with Cook County --> excellent clinical education
- No required research (I hate research)
- I loved every person I met there
- New curriculum/flipped classroom/NO lecture time
Rush Cons:
- weather (I'm a west coast girl who has been in Minneapolis for several years for my fiance -- sooo over the winters)
- limited financial aid/high CoA
- far from my family
- new curriculum (our class would be guinea pigs)
Keck Pros:
- West Coast location; my favorite uncle/aunt/cousin live in LA; direct flight to my hometown in OR
- the. weather.
- better opportunities for west coast residencies
- affiliation with LAC; excellent clinical education
- commitment to service
- more well known/higher ranked
Keck Cons:
- totally transplanting our lives - fiance would need to find a new job, new social circle
- very expensive CoA and cost of living
- required research all 4 years (big for me)
- did not connect with the students there as well as at Rush/didn't feel as at home
- more traditional curriculum/lots of lecture time