S1 to supplant Gemcitabine in resected PCA?

napoleondynamite

Keepin' it real yo
10+ Year Member
Nov 28, 2005
844
77
  1. Attending Physician
    Just presented at the ASCO GI Symposium:

    Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) has been a standard treatment of adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic cancer (PC). S-1 is an oral fluoropyrimidine, and shown to be non-inferior to GEM on overall survival (OS) for unresectable PC. The aim of this study is to determine non-inferiority of S-1 to GEM on OS as an adjuvant chemotherapy for resected PC. Methods: Patients (pts), who met the following criteria; histologically confirmed ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas, R0 or R1 resection, pathological stage I, II, or III with resection of the celiac axis, age >20, no prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy within 3 years, and adequate organ functions, were randomly assigned to GEM (1000 mg/m2, div on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 4 weeks, for 6 courses) or S-1 (40-60 mg according to the body surface, twice a day, for 4 weeks, repeated every 6 weeks, for 4 courses). Primary endpoint was OS. With 180 pts in each, the study had 80% power to prove non-inferiority with a non-inferiority margin of hazard ratio (HR) 1.25 on the basis of expected HR 0.87, at 0.05 two-sided alpha. An interim analysis was planned after 180 deaths. Results: From 4/2007 to 6/2010, 385 pts were enrolled (GEM: 193, S-1: 192) from 33 hospitals in Japan. In 378 pts (GEM: 191, S-1:187) of the full analysis set, background factors were well balanced between groups. Based on the interim analysis on survival data obtained by 7/2012, the independent data monitoring committee recommended to publish the results soon. The HR for S-1 to GEM was 0.56 (95% CI, 0.42-0.74, p<0.0001 for non-inferiority, p<0.0001 for superiority). The 2-year survival rates were 53% (95% CI, 46-60) for GEM and 70% (63-76) for S-1. The reasons for treatment discontinuation (recurrence/toxicity/patient’s refusal/others) were 27/48/5/2 in GEM and 9/40/3/0 in S-1. Incidences (%) of grade 3/4 toxicities in GEM/S-1 were fatigue (4.7/5.4), anorexia (5.8/8.0), leukopenia (38.7/8.6), thrombocytopenia (9.4/4.3), anemia (17.3/13.4), and elevated AST (5.2/1.1). Conclusions: S-1 adjuvant chemotherapy is shown non-inferior, and furthermore, even superior to GEM. S-1 may be considered as the new standard treatment for resected PC pts. Clinical trial information: UMIN000000655.
     
    About the Ads
    This thread is more than 8 years old.

    Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

    1. Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
    2. Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
    3. Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
    4. It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
    5. Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
    6. Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
    7. This thread is locked.