Originally posted by jot
the NIH salary cap for md/phds is about 152k. this means that you can only pay yourself that amount from your grants and no more. it is possible to supplement your income from other sources like clinical work, bartending, or consulting.
-jot
2002 Fiscal year limits are $166,700. However, this doesn't mean that $166,700 is the maximum you can earn - it really depends on your set-up. Or to
put it in NIH terms:
" An individual's base salary, per se, is NOT constrained by the legislative provision for a limitation of salary. The rate limitation simply limits the amount that may be awarded and charged to NIH grants and contracts. An institution may supplement an individual's salary with non-federal funds."
For example if you are a faculty member at an educational institution then you will (probably) have a 9-month 'protected' income, or 'institutional base income'. You are then allowed to raise additional salary for the remaining 3 months out of grant money eg NIH funds. Now, how much you get from NIH depends on how much your 'institutional base income' is. If your 9-month income adjusted to 12 months is *less* than $166,700/year you can only claim that same, lower rate for the remaining 3 months from the NIH grant (at whatever % effort of time you state - 100% of time for 3 months, or 25% of time for one month or whatever). If your 12-month adjusted income is say $250,000 then you can claim up to $166,700/12 per month from NIH. ie you still earn more than $166,700 per year but their cap prevent you from drawing more than this pro-rated per summer month.
There is a further 'out'. That is you can adjust your 12 -month calculation to maximize the NIH funding if you have non-NIH funding. Then you draw whatever salary from your other grants to bring your salary up to $166,700/12 per month.
The other 'out' is that the NIH salary cap does *not* apply to consultant fees under NIH research ie it is more profitable to consult under someone elses grant and let them consult under yours, than to work on your own grants! Some small amount of this mutual back-scratching occurs, but obviously it can't be excessive or NIH would clamp down and insist you make it a sub-contract (in which case nothing in gained as the cap does apply to subcontracts). Consultant fees are must still meet the test of reasonableness, as applied by NIH peer review.
Is this clear? I've been playing these silly grant-salary games for a few years now and there are almost always "ways and means"...but I think you may be worrying about it a little too early!