- Joined
- Dec 6, 2005
- Messages
- 3,068
- Reaction score
- 3,248
Sad story, but not at all clear whey this sedation was necessary for a simple RCT. My guess is the dentist was looking for easy money for the sedation. Yet one more reason root canals should be referred to a specialist.
Sad story, but not at all clear whey this sedation was necessary for a simple RCT. My guess is the dentist was looking for easy money for the sedation. Yet one more reason root canals should be referred to a specialist.
I second the invitation.Sad story, but not at all clear whey this sedation was necessary for a simple RCT. My guess is the dentist was looking for easy money for the sedation. Yet one more reason root canals should be referred to a specialist.
Sad story, but not at all clear whey this sedation was necessary for a simple RCT. My guess is the dentist was looking for easy money for the sedation. Yet one more reason root canals should be referred to a specialist.
I like how they asked the head of the endo department what happened, as if it were the procedure that caused the problems.
I like how they asked the head of the endo department what happened, as if it were the procedure that caused the problems.
More likely is the patient was NERVOUS about the concept of having a root canal and opted for some sedation as a means to make the experience "easier" on themselves.
I have many patients that inquire about sedation for many different procedures, from simple fillings to multiple extractions. Personally I'm not a big fan of oral sedation just simply because it's not a titratable process. *Most* of the time, oral sedation is a safe proceedure as long as you take the steps to ensure its safety (proper history, proper monitoring, etc). If I have a patient that needs sedation for a proceedure, I'm having the dental anesthesiologist that serves my area come to my office, administer IV conscious sedation for me while fully monitoring my patient for me.
As for the root canals should be done by a specialist line, well that's an entirely different story for debate, but lets just say that many, many, many GP's do some mighty fine endo
Sad story, but not at all clear whey this sedation was necessary for a simple RCT. My guess is the dentist was looking for easy money for the sedation. Yet one more reason root canals should be referred to a specialist.
More likely is the patient was NERVOUS about the concept of having a root canal and opted for some sedation as a means to make the experience "easier" on themselves.
I have many patients that inquire about sedation for many different procedures, from simple fillings to multiple extractions. Personally I'm not a big fan of oral sedation just simply because it's not a titratable process. *Most* of the time, oral sedation is a safe proceedure as long as you take the steps to ensure its safety (proper history, proper monitoring, etc). If I have a patient that needs sedation for a proceedure, I'm having the dental anesthesiologist that serves my area come to my office, administer IV conscious sedation for me while fully monitoring my patient for me.
As for the root canals should be done by a specialist line, well that's an entirely different story for debate, but lets just say that many, many, many GP's do some mighty fine endo