- Joined
- Jun 30, 2016
- Messages
- 131
- Reaction score
- 110
Hot off the press, just got a notification from my school that we'll be going back to patient-care activities by the end of May. Anyone else hear any news from their schools?
I don't really see why these decisions are incompatible. As long as you're still following standard stay-at-home practice while you're on rotations, I don't think you're much of a threat to the community. People who have been working in hospitals since the beginning have still had to go to the grocery store, etc. It's a different proposition entirely to work at your home hospital then go rotate at another hospital across the country, and probably worse still to travel to 15 different cities over 8 weeks in interview season and come home in between each trip.We've also been notified of resumption of direct care rotations in ~2 weeks. I'm straight up flabbergasted after the AAMC recommendation for virtual residency interviews came out just a few hours ago.
AAMC: You are a dangerous vector and we cannot allow you to visit the cities you might live in for the next 3-7 years.
My school: It is appropriate for you to fly across the country and begin a sub-I with no quarantine period.
No, that is not hyperbole, that is really what they just told us in an email. We are smack in the middle of the northeast chain of urban hotzones and will be hitting the floors by the end of the month.
I can't even begin to reconcile...
If I'm a dangerous vector, then I'm a dangerous vector. You can't say it's too dangerous for me to fly into the Bay area for an interview, yet also insist it's safe for me to fly from the same place and immediately go on the wards without quarantine.I don't really see why these decisions are incompatible. As long as you're still following standard stay-at-home practice while you're on rotations, I don't think you're much of a threat to the community. People who have been working in hospitals since the beginning have still had to go to the grocery store, etc. It's a different proposition entirely to work at your home hospital then go rotate at another hospital across the country, and probably worse still to travel to 15 different cities over 8 weeks in interview season and come home in between each trip.
I still don't think med students are "essential" in terms of patient care, but we are getting to the point where 3rd and 4th years will soon be exhausting the buffer they had to get everything they need to graduate on time, so I do understand the push to get back on the wards. The situation inside the hospitals, even in the hardest-hit areas, is returning to normal pretty quickly. It will just be a while before public life will return to normal if we want to keep it that way.
I don't really see why these decisions are incompatible. As long as you're still following standard stay-at-home practice while you're on rotations, I don't think you're much of a threat to the community. People who have been working in hospitals since the beginning have still had to go to the grocery store, etc. It's a different proposition entirely to work at your home hospital then go rotate at another hospital across the country, and probably worse still to travel to 15 different cities over 8 weeks in interview season and come home in between each trip.
I still don't think med students are "essential" in terms of patient care, but we are getting to the point where 3rd and 4th years will soon be exhausting the buffer they had to get everything they need to graduate on time, so I do understand the push to get back on the wards. The situation inside the hospitals, even in the hardest-hit areas, is returning to normal pretty quickly. It will just be a while before public life will return to normal if we want to keep it that way.
I misunderstood. I thought you meant flying across the country from your home med school to do an away sub-i at another hospital. Yes, I think it would be more consistent to require a pre-quarantine, but I stand by my argument that bringing you back onto the wards after that is reasonable while promoting travel for aways and interviews is not.If I'm a dangerous vector, then I'm a dangerous vector. You can't say it's too dangerous for me to fly into the Bay area for an interview, yet also insist it's safe for me to fly from the same place and immediately go on the wards without quarantine.
I wonder the same thing. I suspect that all of these solutions fall within LCME requirements and therefore schools have broad discretion. Given how heterogeneous the covid picture is across the US, I think it's better that schools have some discretion. In any case, hospitals are returning to normal quite rapidly even in the worst areas, so I suspect we will see almost all med schools back on the train pretty soon.What I don’t understand is why the LCME isn’t stepping in and giving schools some direction? It sounds to me like every medical school is doing their own thing based on how worried they are about meeting accreditation requirements. Some are letting students return in June and cancelling AIs in order to get core rotations done. Others don’t have rotations until end of July and are allowing students to do their core rotations later in 4th year or reducing credit requirements altogether. Seems like a mess to me.
Good, there is no clear end game to this quarantine. We flattened the curve, that was the goal. Now is time to start returning to daily living to achieve herd immunity.
Yup, go against exactly what every reputable doctor/researcher thinks. That's exactly what we should do.
What do the economists think we should do? Print another 6 trillion to keep our quarantine going?
The curve has barely flattened, and I would be surprised if we didn't see it rise again soon now that so many states are relaxing stay-at-home orders.Good, there is no clear end game to this quarantine. We flattened the curve, that was the goal. Now is time to start returning to daily living to achieve herd immunity.
I must be missing something here - isn't home where we expect most people to get sick? If I go contract COVID at the supermarket or picking up carryout food at a restaurant, I'm not going to feel sick until a few days later, when I will of course be chilling at home.Cuomo said this:
Cuomo says it's 'shocking' most new coronavirus hospitalizations are people who had been staying home
Early look at data from 100 New York hospitals shows that 66% of new admissions related to the virus are people who were at home, Cuomo said.www.cnbc.com
Many of them advocated for quarantine back in March. Wouldn't be surprised if they think opening too quickly and/or going for herd immunity rather than social distancing will be catastrophic for the economy.
Because how can you apply a blanket statement to the whole country? things are different in Iowa than they are in New York CityWhat I don’t understand is why the LCME isn’t stepping in and giving schools some direction? It sounds to me like every medical school is doing their own thing based on how worried they are about meeting accreditation requirements. Some are letting students return in June and cancelling AIs in order to get core rotations done. Others don’t have rotations until end of July and are allowing students to do their core rotations later in 4th year or reducing credit requirements altogether. Seems like a mess to me.
Because how can you apply a blanket statement to the whole country? things are different in Iowa than they are in New York City
That shouldn't matter. It doesn't make sense to say "you can't go to NYC, but you can go to IA" when you're on a plane with someone from NYC on your way to IA. And it isn't cool to give some places an advantage just because they didn't have the misfortune of being a hotspot. There should be standardization.
That shouldn't matter. It doesn't make sense to say "you can't go to NYC, but you can go to IA" when you're on a plane with someone from NYC on your way to IA. And it isn't cool to give some places an advantage just because they didn't have the misfortune of being a hotspot. There should be standardization.
Many hospitals are tracing exactly who transmitted the virus to who, and what they’re finding is one family member contracts the virus in public, and spreads it to the rest of the family at home. Hence, more people contract it at home.I must be missing something here - isn't home where we expect most people to get sick? If I go contract COVID at the supermarket or picking up carryout food at a restaurant, I'm not going to feel sick until a few days later, when I will of course be chilling at home.
Lol NY arrogance at it's finest. Yes it absolutely does matter. You don't need a sledge hammer to put in small screws.
For the record I think places are opening a few weeks too soon, but it's absolutely ridiculous to claim that the entire country needs to be treated the same when each state has circumstances that are drastically different.
Because how can you apply a blanket statement to the whole country? things are different in Iowa than they are in New York City
It is important you understand that everyone who sees patients will see coronavirus patients. You might not know who they are but you will see themGood to hear! Just of curiosity, who will be providing your PPEs and will you guys see coronavirus patients?
The Great Depression showed us we can survive an economic meltdown. A Spanish flu pandemic is far more dangerous.What do the economists think we should do? Print another 6 trillion to keep our quarantine going?
It is important you understand that everyone who sees patients will see coronavirus patients. You might not know who they are but you will see them
Or from the mass of the population getting it (and all the survivors now having antibodies)The Great Depression showed us we can survive an economic meltdown. A Spanish flu pandemic is far more dangerous.
And herd immunity only comes from Vaccination programs.
Or from the mass of the population getting it (and all the survivors now having antibodies)
The Great Depression showed us we can survive an economic meltdown. A Spanish flu pandemic is far more dangerous.
And herd immunity only comes from Vaccination programs.
We're entering one right now.You did not actually just use the Great Depression as an example...wow
We're entering one right now.
I'm at risk for COVID...your rights end where my lungs begin.
You did not actually just use the Great Depression as an example...wow
Yeah that post is why i try to avoid economic discussions on SDN
Our clinical deans are having near nonstop discussions about this.Out of curiousity, for the schools starting up again in the near future, what functional or measurable benchmarks/indicators for adequate student protection are being implemented? Since exact return dates are all kind of random subject to change at any time, given each school's curricular timeline, location etc.
I am currently located in the greater NYC area, home institution in CA. From my understanding of both locations (I understand middle America may feel differently) the in-hospital situation is absolutely not suitable for student involvement at present. Given the general concensus amongst most medical experts in the media/in my personal circle that our accelerated reopening of some aspects of the economy/reduced adherence to social distancing by people over time will lead to continued increasing of cases into the summer, I am most intrigued to try and comprehend why some schools send students back in now. What am I missing?
Yeah, I just cannot for the life of me comprehend how some schools (in places I can take a guess at from familiar SDN user responses) have decided now is the time. And how they arrived at that decision.Our clinical deans are having near nonstop discussions about this.
Everything seems to circle back to what is safe for the students, and at the top of the list are having enough PPE, and the number of COVID cases in the area.
The data is just as murky to my colleagues!Yeah, I just cannot for the life of me comprehend how some schools (in places I can take a guess at from familiar SDN user responses) have decided now is the time. And how they arrived at that decision.
My school is sending back sub-I's first and resuming other clerkships in July (makes no sense to me, you'd think subI would be more dangerous than other cores).Out of curiousity, for the schools starting up again in the near future, what functional or measurable benchmarks/indicators for adequate student protection, safety are being implemented? Since exact return dates are all kind of random subject to change at any time, given each school's curricular timeline, location etc. Students are not employees. Employees i.e. doctors/nurses are not even being adequately protected in many instances yet. Students are young, sure, but many have all sorts of predisposing underlying health conditions or risks which may exacerbate COVID infections.
I am currently located in the greater NYC area, home institution in CA. From my understanding of both locations (I understand middle America may feel differently) the in-hospital situation is absolutely not suitable for student involvement at present. Given the general concensus amongst most medical experts in the media/in my personal circle that our accelerated reopening of some aspects of the economy/reduced adherence to social distancing by people over time will lead to continued increasing of cases into the summer, I am most intrigued to try and comprehend why some schools send students back in now. What am I missing?
To be honest, to me this also screams "introducing greater systematic change onto the familiar match/M4 timeline would take too much work, let's just try to force a square peg into a round hole and if anyone suffers the consequences it's the students that can't really do much to complain in an efficacious manner anyways."My school is sending back sub-I's first and resuming other clerkships in July (makes no sense to me, you'd think subI would be more dangerous than other cores).
We apparently do not need any quarantine after flying into the city, we can just go straight onto the wards. Policy will be that we don't see any patients on PPE precautions, both to save PPE and avoid COVID exposure.
So I guess we're just going to have an "acting intern" experience where we stand outside the rooms for 50% of rounds and can only be responsible for any admissions that are unlikely to need any PPE precautions.
Franky their behavior screams "we need to resume sub-I's ASAP to make sure all MS3s have one under their belt by ERAS, and the fact that we're a hotspot in the middle of our peak be damned"
Yeah, and they're sending very mixed messages. Our critical care and ED rotations are cancelled indefinitely right now for example, and the hospital is closed to audition rotations until at least October.To be honest, to me this also screams "introducing greater systematic change onto the familiar match/M4 timeline would take too much work, let's just try to force a square peg into a round hole and if anyone suffers the consequences it's the students that can't really do much to complain in an efficacious manner anyways."
because we all know how easy it is to just stay away from COVID+ individuals.
My school is sending back sub-I's first and resuming other clerkships in July (makes no sense to me, you'd think subI would be more dangerous than other cores).
We apparently do not need any quarantine after flying into the city, we can just go straight onto the wards. Policy will be that we don't see any patients on PPE precautions, both to save PPE and avoid COVID exposure.
So I guess we're just going to have an "acting intern" experience where we stand outside the rooms for 50% of rounds and can only be responsible for any admissions that are unlikely to need any PPE precautions.
Franky their behavior screams "we need to resume sub-I's ASAP to make sure all MS3s have one under their belt by ERAS, and the fact that we're a hotspot in the middle of our peak be damned"
I see no good options, really. There's also the elephant in the room of a second wave that hasn't been addressed whatsoever at our dean's town halls. In 1918 it was the second wave in flu season that killed an order of magnitude more people. If we get another crazy COVID spike where much of the East Coast looks like NYC in April...I have absolutely no idea what they could do besides letting us complete online versions of our rotations.While I absolutely agree that with a lack of adequate PPE that students shouldn’t be using that valuable equipment... what is the solution? Postpone it for a while, then what? The rising M4’s do what instead? What about the M3’s?
That’s the problem. I was absolutely okay with doing my last rotation online, but it was my last rotation.