Reply to thread

Hi Guest: Check out our new article here: It Pays to Be an Early (Financial) Bird

Message: <blockquote data-quote="PinchandBurn" data-source="post: 12246753" data-attributes="member: 342600">according to the article:"Everything has to be taken in context," Balow said. "If you take things out of context and only record what you want, or only play what you want, the conversation becomes something of another flavor."If physicians are concerned about patients or family members recording visits, one strategy is to create an office policy preventing recording devices, said Frank B. O'Neil, a spokesman for the national medical liability carrier ProAssurance Corp. Like any rule, doctors should visibly post the policy in their office and make sure patients take note, he said. The policy should be explicitly stated so that patients aren't surprised if the issue comes up."If you're not comfortable with it, you should have a policy you can point to," he said.Atleast this way you may have a chance of somethign not being allowed in court, since it was illegally obtained.   Better than nothing.  But I agree, it shouldnt be allowed either way since it can be a possible HIPAA violation.  For example, patients can not only audio record, but video record other patients that come to the clinic.</blockquote>

This thread is more than 8 years old.

Your message may be considered spam for the following reasons:

Your new thread title is very short, and likely is unhelpful.
Your reply is very short and likely does not add anything to the thread.
Your reply is very long and likely does not add anything to the thread.
It is very likely that it does not need any further discussion and thus bumping it serves no purpose.
Your message is mostly quotes or spoilers.
Your reply has occurred very quickly after a previous reply and likely does not add anything to the thread.
This thread is locked.