Section Bank P/S #56 (spoiler)

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
6

663697

94ff27fad1d6777a4e160916ce65fd93.png

e822204da523b644ae3042b1c8f9d31c.png



Conclusion:
473f36da74d4733a7e2e9848f4cba58e.png


The experiment was testing the responses of normal sleep and sleep-deprived subjects to assess differences in brain activation, hunger rating, etc. after viewing images of high- or low-caloric foods.

Given the differences above, wouldn't there be a difference in perhaps the activation of the nucleus accumbens or amygdala between the 2 groups? If the cerebellum is not involved in the reward system, then wouldn't both groups have a similar negligible activation of the cerebellum?

Members don't see this ad.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1 user
Poorly worded question. Think of it as: which among the following brain structures would be most different between tsd and s groups? I think the fact that the cerebellum isn't involved in the limbic/reward pathway, that's the answer.
 
Top