- Joined
- Dec 28, 2007
- Messages
- 139
- Reaction score
- 3
Ahhh sepsis, blocking and tackling for EM.
I came accross this article recently and was wondering if some of you had already essentially been doing this or if this was going to change your practice in any way. Here is the link to the PDF: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/303/8/739.
Essentially, Jones et al. via a well designed non-blinded RCT show non-inferiority of lactate clearance (defined as a change in lactate of 10% at 2 hrs) as compared to continuous scvo2 monitoring. I know, for a variety of reasons, people don't love continuous scvo2. So, I think it will be interesting to see how these data effect practice patterns. Is lactate clearance going to be one of the new sepsis resus targets and we'll see the Edwards catheter go the way of the dinosaur?
I came accross this article recently and was wondering if some of you had already essentially been doing this or if this was going to change your practice in any way. Here is the link to the PDF: http://jama.ama-assn.org/cgi/reprint/303/8/739.
Essentially, Jones et al. via a well designed non-blinded RCT show non-inferiority of lactate clearance (defined as a change in lactate of 10% at 2 hrs) as compared to continuous scvo2 monitoring. I know, for a variety of reasons, people don't love continuous scvo2. So, I think it will be interesting to see how these data effect practice patterns. Is lactate clearance going to be one of the new sepsis resus targets and we'll see the Edwards catheter go the way of the dinosaur?