Sexual disfunction due to vaginal and breast exams

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.
umm...that is what a causal link is...


and I honestly don't get how a media form that glorifies womanly sexual attributes would in anyway make someone want something the exact opposite. It's like saying commercials for cars makes people buy barbie dolls... pre- and post-pubescent women look nothing alike...

"Regular" sex becomes less and less exciting/stimulating, so you keep searching for more and more bizarre things to fulfill your need to be stimulated. Unchecked, that might result in pedophilia.

At least I think that's the theory anyway.

Members don't see this ad.
 
derailed-train-derailed-thread-demo.jpg
 
Members don't see this ad :)
umm...that is what a causal link is...


and I honestly don't get how a media form that glorifies womanly sexual attributes would in anyway make someone want something the exact opposite. It's like saying commercials for cars makes people buy barbie dolls... pre- and post-pubescent women look nothing alike...

by that logic, birth is the cause of death.

I can understand intellectually why it doesn't make sense, but these pedophiles don't only view child pornography. (See another study below)

http://www.ccoso.org/library articles/Research and Statistics - T...pdf

...I'll say it again, it's not my intention to debate casual effects of pornography. I am not an expert in this area. I have my personal beliefs which are not completely ignorant. I have two beautiful children who I try to protect to the best of my ability and this is an area of concern for me. We've got quite a few child molesters in my neighborhood. I also don't want one of my kids turning into a molester down the road. I am by no means a "Beaver Cleaver", nor do I expect my children to be. I fully understand that there is counter-evidence to most studies and ultimately the choice of what to believe is placed on those who read them. I do understand the viewpoints of all of you whom I have refuted, and I will go ahead and state for the record that I do not think you are ignorant, an idiot or otherwise incapable of intelligent thought.

My intention (again) was to point out that the OP's beliefs are by no means isolated or ignorant. His personal choices are well respected by many good people. Turning him into the butt of every typical locker room joke is in poor taste.

The End.
 
You can't just end a discussion because you want to. This is the internet.
 
You can't just end a discussion because you want to. This is the internet.

I can end my contribution to the discussion. Hence..."The End."
 
Children, calm yourselves.

I think this is a legimate question. Males naturally think about sex many times throughout the day, and to subject oneself to the field that is medicine could naturally make one worry. It's over exposure to many "private parts", many diseased "privates". And I believe the worry presents itself as: "Will I be able to have a "normal" sex life despite the images that now pervade my brain?"

OP, if you feel that you need to talk to someone about this, you should look to campus therapeutic services, or a mental health professional trained to address issues such as this. It is natural to be curious about this question regardless of one's religious beliefs.

What should be emphasized is that when you are working with patients you remain professional. Leave the sex for the bedroom.. or the kitchen.. or the club.. or whatever one prefers.
 
whom I have refuted.

:laugh:

The takeaway for the precious youngsters reading this thread is that pornography and premarital sex are perfectly natural and won't turn you into a pedophile.

And you'll still be perfectly normal despite examining patients as a physician.
 
Oh so because one (or four, or 10) MD's were quacks, all MD's are quacks eh?

Next you'll be telling me that the divorce rate is lower in non-religious folks...

...and I'm sure your porn freak friends would admit to you that they enjoyed child porn, if indeed they do.

Strong claim. Sounds like you know how it works :laugh: from experience.

There are several reasons to abstain from sex.

1. Emotional consequences

2. Physical consequences: pregnancy, getting an abortion (ethically borderline, at best), perhaps keeping the baby and having to raise it, and the big problem... STDs and STIs. They're everywhere. Honestly, without the HPV vaccine, I wouldn't feel comfortable just kissing anyone, period.
lol no.

1. There are no emotional consequences from sex... since you're obviously a virgin it makes no sense for you to claim that there is other than what your grade 7 sex-ed teacher said.

2. Condoms and birth control pills do a spectacular job preventing pregnancies. Most guys dont even care about condoms and many use a condom that's been in their wallet all heated up for 2 weeks without caring, then we get that "1% chance of knocking the chick up" thing.

STDs everywhere? Not a good excuse to be a virgin brah. Wearing a condom (again) does an excellent job protecting you. If you're so worried about life risks, you should avoid driving cars as well since that presents a greater health-risk than having protected sex.

HPV? You cant get it from kissing... it's a very very minor theoritical risk and is mainly associated with one strand (HPV-16). But your actual odds of getting it from kissing someone who has it approaches very close to 0. Oh and most HPV strands are 100% harmless. If they werent, most of the human population in north american would be walking around with cervical cancer,penis cancer and oral cancer.
and we are counting WoW as a religion, right?
No cause WoWers are pro-fappers
 
by that logic, birth is the cause of death.

I can understand intellectually why it doesn't make sense, but these pedophiles don't only view child pornography. (See another study below)

http://www.ccoso.org/library articles/Research and Statistics - T...pdf

...I'll say it again, it's not my intention to debate casual effects of pornography. I am not an expert in this area. I have my personal beliefs which are not completely ignorant. I have two beautiful children who I try to protect to the best of my ability and this is an area of concern for me. We've got quite a few child molesters in my neighborhood. I also don't want one of my kids turning into a molester down the road. I am by no means a "Beaver Cleaver", nor do I expect my children to be. I fully understand that there is counter-evidence to most studies and ultimately the choice of what to believe is placed on those who read them. I do understand the viewpoints of all of you whom I have refuted, and I will go ahead and state for the record that I do not think you are ignorant, an idiot or otherwise incapable of intelligent thought.

My intention (again) was to point out that the OP's beliefs are by no means isolated or ignorant. His personal choices are well respected by many good people. Turning him into the butt of every typical locker room joke is in poor taste.

The End.
If you have a son (one/both of your 2 kids) they will fap daily to porn whether you like it or not. As do all males with normal sex drives. It has nothing to do with becoming a pedo or else a large majority of the male population would be a pedo.
 
"Regular" sex becomes less and less exciting/stimulating, so you keep searching for more and more bizarre things to fulfill your need to be stimulated. Unchecked, that might result in pedophilia.

At least I think that's the theory anyway.

So does this mean after I have had sex enough times even with the same partner I would want a new or younger partner each time to make it more exciting?
 
If you have a son (one/both of your 2 kids) they will fap daily to porn whether you like it or not. As do all males with normal sex drives. It has nothing to do with becoming a pedo or else a large majority of the male population would be a pedo.

I agree. I mean even a wet dream is your brain doing what your hands won't. Hold out long enough and your brain will take care of it.
 
Members don't see this ad :)
So does this mean after I have had sex enough times even with the same partner I would want a new or younger partner each time to make it more exciting?

absolutely yes. i dont even know how some older married couples have sex frequently... oh wait they dont :laugh:
I agree. I mean even a wet dream is your brain doing what your hands won't. Hold out long enough and your brain will take care of it.

this. which is why i always lol @ religious folks talking about how fapping is bad or whatever.
 
When did "fapping" become nomenclature for jacking off? There are much more amusing names for it.
 
When did "fapping" become nomenclature for jacking off? There are much more amusing names for it.
lolwat

fappings been in common use ever since the invention of the internet (only semi serious)
 
I like to work in the phrase "beat it like it owes me money". The "____ the _____" statements dont flog my dolphin, if you know what im sayin
 
So does Mark Sanchez, but I don't see how women who love terrible passers have any relevance here...

Just thought I would jump on this chance to post a picture of kate upton.

kate-upton-measurements-dougie-0.jpg
 
So we went from... the OP asking whether or not he'll still be able to get boners after seeing what he thought were going to be naked porn stars on a daily basis, when the whole thing made no sense since he doesnt even watch porn.... to discussing alternative terminology for fapping.
 
I simply think that making the OP the butt of all the assorted jokes because of his beliefs is in poor taste.

It isn't in poor taste, it should be encouraged because his train of thought is downright absurd.
 
I am a first year student and we are learning how to do breast exams and vaginal exams. One of my concerns is that as a medical student / physician I will see so many breasts and vaginas that I will have less interest in my significant other. I am wondering if it may lead to sexual disfunction of any kind.

For what its worth: I would consider myself to be the very conservative type and have decided to limit sex to marriage. I am not married nor have I ever been married. I also avoid pornography.

I would appreciate it if the comments were limited to appropriate responses.

Ok, I'll give a serious response... Although, I am seriously enjoying guatemalan goat market references.

Your fear/worry is understandable given your decision to wait until you are married for sexual intimacy. Seeing the reproductive organs of a patient will not change how you are attracted to your significant other. You will learn that seeing and experiencing things from a professional perspective is FAR different from your personal life.

The only things that will effect your libido during your education are stress level and sleep deprivation.
 
Tweak the rooster.

Take the goat to the Guatemalan market.

Squirreling.

Going to go "pray for the starving children"

I have no idea where you heard these or their etiology, but from here on out I am never referring to masturbation as anything other than "taking the goat to the Guatemalan market."
 
I give this troll a 10/10, and I definitely will read again.
 
I have no idea where you heard these or their etiology, but from here on out I am never referring to masturbation as anything other than "taking the goat to the Guatemalan market."

:laugh::laugh: does this make sense to anyone though? I hope not, because that's what makes it so much more special.
 
This thread makes me realize how many future physicians live in a totally unrealistic world and are so very very ignorant to basic conditions within the world they live.

This also makes me very very sad.
 
In my experience, when you do these exams in a professional manner, there isn't any sexual association whatsoever. If you have a sexual association with these exams and procedures, then that is an entirely separate issue.

Be a professional and it shouldn't be a problem. The last thing in my mind when I am with my wife (both intimately and non-intimately) is patient procedures and exams. Just sayin'...
 
This thread makes me realize how many future physicians live in a totally unrealistic world and are so very very ignorant to basic conditions within the world they live.

This also makes me very very sad.

It really is pretty surprising considering the amount of effort schools try and put in to selecting "wholesome," "well-rounded," and "socially aware" individuals. Something isn't quite working too well...

...or medicine is filled with sociopaths capable of putting forward the necessary face to "succeed."
 
It really is pretty surprising considering the amount of effort schools try and put in to selecting "wholesome," "well-rounded," and "socially aware" individuals. Something isn't quite working too well...

...or medicine is filled with sociopaths capable of putting forward the necessary face to "succeed."

images
 
It really is pretty surprising considering the amount of effort schools try and put in to selecting "wholesome," "well-rounded," and "socially aware" individuals. Something isn't quite working too well...

...or medicine is filled with sociopaths capable of putting forward the necessary face to "succeed."

time to start weeding out virgins!
 
You know what, I'm sure you must be right. When my kid craps on the couch, I won't bother to teach him to crap in the toilet....it must be a biological imperative because my dog does it too.

Oh yeah, and Buddy and Pedro, the "gay" penguins at the Toronto zoo (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technol...ay-penguins-attracted-to-new-female-partners/) must have been "biologically confused" when they moved on to new, female partners. OOOOH, there must be a separate gene for bisexual penguins!

I'm sure Buddy's just a repressed transgender penguin who would tell you so.....if he could talk

Great. You're exactly the kind of person who would send his/her gay child to gay camp to "fix" them because it's not "natural." And I especially love your pornography snowballing into pedophilia bit. You're an idiot, and I dub thee Santorum's Little Minion.
 
You know what, I'm sure you must be right. When my kid craps on the couch, I won't bother to teach him to crap in the toilet....it must be a biological imperative because my dog does it too.

Oh yeah, and Buddy and Pedro, the "gay" penguins at the Toronto zoo (http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technol...ay-penguins-attracted-to-new-female-partners/) must have been "biologically confused" when they moved on to new, female partners. OOOOH, there must be a separate gene for bisexual penguins!

I'm sure Buddy's just a repressed transgender penguin who would tell you so.....if he could talk

- You're debating naturalism vs. modern civilization, that's a whole different debate that is 100% irrelevant to this thread

- Humans are born of a variety of sexual orientations. The vast majority are born as heterosexuals with a small minority being homosexuals. Some people will also be in the "middle" in terms of heterosexual and homosexual orientation and be called bisexuals. Given that humans and all living things are related together and we all originated from the first same cells, it of course makes sense we are predisposed to these things. Also, as a heterosexual male it is beyond ridiculous to suggest someone can suddenly "turn gay."
 
Great. You're exactly the kind of person who would send his/her gay child to gay camp to "fix" them because it's not "natural." And I especially love your pornography snowballing into pedophilia bit. You're an idiot, and I dub thee Santorum's Little Minion.

I can't even comprehend how someone can suggest porn turns men into pedos. If that were true, a large majority (like nearly every man) should be a pedophile.
 
- You're debating naturalism vs. modern civilization, that's a whole different debate that is 100% irrelevant to this thread

- Humans are born of a variety of sexual orientations. The vast majority are born as heterosexuals with a small minority being homosexuals. Some people will also be in the "middle" in terms of heterosexual and homosexual orientation and be called bisexuals. Given that humans and all living things are related together and we all originated from the first same cells, it of course makes sense we are predisposed to these things. Also, as a heterosexual male it is beyond ridiculous to suggest someone can suddenly "turn gay."

Not to mention that Deekle is trying to sweep a behavior observed in 1500 species under the rug... might as well claim that animals don't sleep. :confused:

From the middle of October until next summer the Norwegian Natural History Museum of the University of Oslo will host the first exhibition that focuses on homosexuality in the animal kingdom.

“One fundamental premise in social debates has been that homosexuality is unnatural. This premise is wrong. Homosexuality is both common and highly essential in the lives of a number of species,” explains Petter Boeckman, who is the academic advisor for the “Against Nature’s Order?” exhibition.
The most well-known homosexual animal is the dwarf chimpanzee, one of humanity’s closes relatives. The entire species is bisexual. Sex plays an conspicuous roll in all their activities and takes the focus away from violence, which is the most typical method of solving conflicts among primates and many other animals.

“Sex among dwarf chimpanzees is in fact the business of the whole family, and the cute little ones often lend a helping hand when they engage in oral sex with each other.”

Lions are also homosexual. Male lions often band together with their brothers to lead the pride. To ensure loyalty, they strengthen the bonds by often having sex with each other.

Homosexuality is also quite common among dolphins and killer whales. The pairing of males and females is fleeting, while between males, a pair can stay together for years. Homosexual sex between different species is not unusual either. Meetings between different dolphin species can be quite violent, but the tension is often broken by a “sex orgy”.
 
Argumentum Ad Hominem and false representations of my words will not make you right.

I don't much appreciate being called an idiot. I'm not. I've treated you all with dignity and respect. I expect the same.

You have your opinions. Enjoy them. You're entitled to them. I'm entitled to mine. We're both privileged to be able to share them in this forum, and have the freedom to ignore them as well.

As I stated earlier, I'm through contributing to this debate. I find no further value in it.

The horse is dead...feel free to stop beating it.
 
As I stated earlier, I'm through contributing to this debate. I find no further value in it.

The horse is dead...feel free to stop beating it.

and yet you came back to it:rolleyes: not to mention that you ended with an awful, if unintentional pun.

If you find that there's no further value in it, stop clicking on it.
 
I am a first year student and we are learning how to do breast exams and vaginal exams. One of my concerns is that as a medical student / physician I will see so many breasts and vaginas that I will have less interest in my significant other. I am wondering if it may lead to sexual disfunction of any kind.
Hell no.
 
When did "fapping" become nomenclature for jacking off? There are much more amusing names for it.

There's this Illuminati-like organization known as the chans, and the 4chan is the most prolific of them.

:idea:
 
+1

Seriously though, exmissionary, thanks for asking this question, because I'm sure a lot of people have wondered about it.

If Jake Gyllenhaal / Zac Efron / insert any celebrity crush you fancy was your private patient that you'd be required to see nekkid on a regular basis, of course it's entirely plausible you may get "excited." But to even consider, as the OP does, that routine medical exams on the average person (or watching porn) leads to some negative feedback/attenuation causing IMPOTENCE is crazy. It's the type of bullcrap that's taught by rightwing, self righteous, holier-than-thou loonies to maintain a completely unsubstantiated status quo. It's quite sad really.
 
Top