Seriously? Are you mentally deficient? Lemme guess, you're one of those knuckleheads that thinks "Caucasian" = "Irish/British Isles Caucasian" or "North Western European Caucasian"?
Caucasian is a race based on bone structure. Caucasoids can have a wide range of facial features, but the most common components include a narrow, projecting nose, projecting chin, thin to medium lips, and large eyes of different shapes. It has no bearing on skin color whatsoever. It spans a vast range of people from Europe (an arbitrarily defined part of Asia, and NOT an isolated place by itself) to Southern Asia. In fact, if you knew anything about race, you would know that the Middle East and South Asia are WHERE the Caucasoid race developed. When these people migrated into Europe, over time, they mixed with three different groups of Caucasians, all of whom came from Asia and the Middle East, giving rise to present-day European peoples. There is NO such thing as a "pure" race or a "pure White" -- the term "White" is f***ing stupid in itself, because most "White" people are Beige or Olive, only the Irish and Northern Europeans are on average "Really light Beige" or "White" -- but still not really paper white in most cases. The rest of Europe -- including Southern and East Europe is darker on average -- and more like Beige - Olive- Light Brown, and in some cases, even Brown. The same goes for the Middle East, except they have fewer "Beige" colored people. Ditto for South Asia.
If you had even an ounce of IQ, you would be able to discern the differences between having "Caucasian" or "White" (again an erroneously conflated set of terms) facial features and bone structure, and having "White" skin. Many Chinese people (who belong to the Mongoloid race) have skin that is "Beige" or "White" -- in fact, Whit-er than many Europeans, Middle Easterners and South Asians. Does that make them "White" or "Caucasian"? The whole fiasco of naming people by color is such a f**k fest that I don't even know where to begin.
Case in point: This guy is an Italian.
Does he look "White" to you? Or simply "Caucasian"? I'd say the latter.
What about George Clooney?
Does he look "White" like Brad Pitt does? Absolutely Not. But he DOES look completely Caucasian.
By the same token, these Indian men are COMPLETELY Caucasian, regardless of their pigmentation:
Hrithik Roshan (has the same skin color as George Clooney incidentally, or John Stamos)
Shashi Kapoor:
^^These men above are just as Caucasian as George Clooney and the Italian guy above him, even though in the eyes of the illiterate person, they would look more Caucasian than the Italian guy, and in some cases, even George Clooney, because they happen to be lighter-skinned or "White" looking. Sheesh. The amount of ignorance is astounding.
And btw, look up any pubmed genetic study -- Indians are classed as Caucasians in every one of them. In fact, they still mark "White/Caucasian" in the USA as they are allowed to self-identify as what they wish -- since Indian is a nationality, and like the other poster said, Indian has more than 2000 different ethnic groups, some look Mongoloid/Chinese in the North East, some are Dravidian and look like Mindy Kaling (these people are darker, have different facial features and bone structure and are NOT Caucasian), some are tribal Australoids (again not Caucasian) and some are completely Caucasian like the North Indians pictured above.