1. Hey Guest! Check out the 3 MCAT Study Plan Options listed in the 'stickies' area at the top of the forums (BoomBoom, SN2ed, and MCATJelly). Let us know which you like best.

    Also, we now offer a MCAT Test-Prep Exhibitions Forum where you can ask questions directly from the test-prep services.
    Dismiss Notice
  2. Dismiss Notice
  3. Download free Tapatalk for iPhone or Tapatalk for Android for your phone and follow the SDN forums with push notifications.
    Dismiss Notice
Dismiss Notice

Interview Feedback: Visit Interview Feedback to view and submit interview information.

Interviewing Masterclass: Free masterclass on interviewing from SDN and Medical College of Georgia

Dismiss Notice
Hey Texans—join us for a DFW meetup! Click here to learn more.

Simple quantum question

Discussion in 'MCAT Discussions' started by jammin06, Apr 27, 2004.

  1. jammin06

    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sup everyone, i'm workin on the EK chemistry book right now, and i just came across the following question:

    Compared to an electron with a principle quantum number of 1, an electron with a principal quantum number of 2 will have:

    lower energy
    higher energy
    negative spin
    positive spin

    I think the answer is higher energy, but the book tells me that it's lower energy. Can someone explain this concept to me? Thanks a ton.
     
  2. Note: SDN Members do not see this ad.

  3. duck2005

    duck2005 Member
    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 14, 2004
    Messages:
    78
    Likes Received:
    0
    nope. HIGHER energy. the lowest energy = ground state = lowest n. Furthermore, Energy of e- = -R/n^2. R is a constant. higher n = lower (R/n^2) = higher -R/n^2. Don't forget the negative in that equation. Plus, more generally, lower energies have aways been associated with lower n.

    higher n does, though, mean lower ionization energy. energy of an e- in orbit is negative. energy of freed electron (after ionization) = 0. thus, the higher the n, the higher the energy (which means less negative), and the less energy necessary to raise this negative energy to a value of 0.
     
  4. Lion-O

    Lion-O Sight beyond sight.
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2004
    Messages:
    196
    Likes Received:
    0
    duck2005 nailed it: definitely higher energy.
     
  5. PhatGtDmB

    PhatGtDmB Member
    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Dec 16, 2002
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    4
    w/o a doubt HIGHER energy
     
  6. jammin06

    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    0
    woo, so i've found my first error in the EK series....yay for me! maybe this an omen to tell me i wont COMPLETELY bomb the entire mcat :)
     
  7. lihini

    lihini Member
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2003
    Messages:
    68
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree HIGHER energy !
     
  8. fun8stuff

    fun8stuff *hiding from patients*
    15+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2003
    Messages:
    3,068
    Likes Received:
    39
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    correct! .
     
  9. gdk

    gdk Senior Member
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2003
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    7
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    you might want to check the errata on the ek website. that one might have already been noted, along with some others you haven't found yet
     
  10. jammin06

    7+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Nov 5, 2003
    Messages:
    607
    Likes Received:
    0
    yea, i posted it on their website, but no one has responded. They changed the format of website, so all the old posts are gone i think. It'll pick back up in the summer when everyone else is using the material though.
     
  11. tae1703

    tae1703 Senior Member
    10+ Year Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2003
    Messages:
    264
    Likes Received:
    0
    Status:
    Resident [Any Field]
    i would say higher energy, unless i completely wasted my time and money going to my selected university
     
  12. ChemMN

    ChemMN Member
    5+ Year Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2004
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Everyone here is absolutely correct. An electron must gain energy in the form of a photon to be promoted to n=2. It doesn't radiate energy in this transition.
     

Share This Page