- Joined
- May 18, 2002
- Messages
- 234
- Reaction score
- 3
I had lunch with a friend today, an IM doc I like a lot. She wrinkled her nose when I said I had really enjoyed working with an FP on my primary care rotation, and questioned why I would want to go for "breadth rather than depth." She said, "You can never know it all - you won't have expertise in any one area."
Part of my friend's objection was that the 3-year FP training doesn't give you enough exposure to the weird zebras of medicine - you aren't as well-versed in the esoteric stuff. She admitted that most of real-world IM practice is pretty much identical to real-world FP practice, but continued to express concern that you just don't learn enough medicine during an FP residency.
Now, to be honest, this was my view of FP too until I spent time with one - I used to describe it as "jack of all trades, master of none." (without knowing anything about it of course, but then when does that stop any of us from forming opinions??!!)
but now I am really psyched about the field - loved the variety, loved the connection with whole families, appreciated the strong emphasis on health promotion. Another thing is that I really enjoyed the outpatient part of my peds rotation but I definitely would NOT want to do peds all day (ugh)... I like the idea of doing a little bit o' everything.
I suppose someone in peds could object to FP on the basis that if I don't like it well enough to do it full-time then I shouldn't do it, period. I don't agree, but I can see that point.
So that's one objection - my view is that FP's body of knowledge, while broad, isn't necessarily lacking in depth and that there isn't nearly as much difference between IM and FP as my friend was implying. I'd like others' comments.
The other negative comment came from my IM preceptor on my primary care rotation - he said that FP docs often "don't get respect" in academic settings, although that was slowly changing, and cautioned me that if I was interested in pursuing academic medicine, I might be wise to prefer IM to FP.
Soooooo what have you all heard and what's your response? In the end I am almost surely going to go FP regardless of these negative comments, 'cause I loved it, but I want to be able to battle that "breadth not depth" remark!
Part of my friend's objection was that the 3-year FP training doesn't give you enough exposure to the weird zebras of medicine - you aren't as well-versed in the esoteric stuff. She admitted that most of real-world IM practice is pretty much identical to real-world FP practice, but continued to express concern that you just don't learn enough medicine during an FP residency.
Now, to be honest, this was my view of FP too until I spent time with one - I used to describe it as "jack of all trades, master of none." (without knowing anything about it of course, but then when does that stop any of us from forming opinions??!!)
but now I am really psyched about the field - loved the variety, loved the connection with whole families, appreciated the strong emphasis on health promotion. Another thing is that I really enjoyed the outpatient part of my peds rotation but I definitely would NOT want to do peds all day (ugh)... I like the idea of doing a little bit o' everything.
I suppose someone in peds could object to FP on the basis that if I don't like it well enough to do it full-time then I shouldn't do it, period. I don't agree, but I can see that point.
So that's one objection - my view is that FP's body of knowledge, while broad, isn't necessarily lacking in depth and that there isn't nearly as much difference between IM and FP as my friend was implying. I'd like others' comments.
The other negative comment came from my IM preceptor on my primary care rotation - he said that FP docs often "don't get respect" in academic settings, although that was slowly changing, and cautioned me that if I was interested in pursuing academic medicine, I might be wise to prefer IM to FP.
Soooooo what have you all heard and what's your response? In the end I am almost surely going to go FP regardless of these negative comments, 'cause I loved it, but I want to be able to battle that "breadth not depth" remark!