- Joined
- Apr 18, 2011
- Messages
- 135
- Reaction score
- 33
Who does it? What pathology? What are the results?
There is limited sprint literature on delayed response w/some patients not getting relief until sometimes a few months after removal...which I didn't believe until a patient told me this happened to him for one place in his shoulder (not by me).
Why?I won’t immediately RFA a pt who failed sprint (like the one I’ve had) without first waiting a few months.
Suffering build character.Why?
Why?
This is sadly occurring more often than notPersonally, I wouldn't let the prior use of Sprint impact my decision to ablate or not ablate.
Pain = Ablate IMO.
A well-performed RFA usually works. Problem is, it appears most doctors suck at that procedure. They haphazardly throw needles down in the vicinity of the MBN and they're done. If the RFA fails it doesn't matter bc the PA will see the clinic follow up.
How do you describe rearborization of the MBBs after RFA then?how are nerves regenerating in a different path?
all the nerves we are ablating for spine are inside a myelin sheath.
the nerve will regenerate in that myelin sheath...
unless you destroy the myelin sheath by injecting phenol or absolute alcohol
This. Most people do a ****ty job at RF. I’m so glad to hear they can do it in five minutes under AP only….Personally, I wouldn't let the prior use of Sprint impact my decision to ablate or not ablate.
Pain = Ablate IMO.
A well-performed RFA usually works. Problem is, it appears most doctors suck at that procedure. They haphazardly throw needles down in the vicinity of the MBN and they're done. If the RFA fails it doesn't matter bc the PA will see the clinic follow up.
thanks, the concept of RFA coagulation of nerves is interesting, so that we can coagulate the nerves in the same location many many times, 80 degree with90 second will destroy the nerve entirely, protein denature of Schwann cells at site will happen for sure. I just cannot attribute recurrent rf failure due to ***ty techniques, why the first one successful? I encounter more genicular rf failure.the nerve root "growing" back to their end point via the myelin sheath... the sheath remains intact with RFA. not so with phenol. at least that is how i was taught...
the thought with phenol and why you get such severe deafferentation pain is that one is forming a scar neuroma at the site of destruction of the sheath.
thanks, the concept of RFA coagulation of nerves is interesting, so that we can coagulate the nerves in the same location many many times, 80 degree with90 second will destroy the nerve entirely, protein denature of Schwann cells at site will happen for sure. I just cannot attribute recurrent rf failure due to ***ty techniques, why the first one successful? I encounter more genicular rf failure.
This. Most people do a ****ty job at RF. I’m so glad to hear they can do it in five minutes under AP only….
Facet loading pain on exam in younger patient and + response to LMBBs. Have only done 5 for LBP, so take that for what it's worth. 4/5 have had sustained >70% relief and 2 at 100 (furthest is only ~9 months out). 5th patient only had ~20% relief after removal 1 month ago. Of these folks, the best responders also had +ttp overlying facets and also hadn't had multiple prior RFAs. There is limited sprint literature on delayed response w/some patients not getting relief until sometimes a few months after removal...which I didn't believe until a patient told me this happened to him for one place in his shoulder (not by me).
Nice, i encountered that as well, people failed rfa from other providers, i repeated it worked, however the successful rate of 2nd,3rd and 4th time of repeat decline is observed from my practice.I have many local patients who had a good result with first RFA, then fail the second or third RFA from the same physician(s)
I have repeated RFA in these patients and every single one of them did much better after my RFA….which took more than 15 minutes to perform, because I did it with SIS technique.
No offense but I haven’t seen that in my practice.Nice, i encountered that as well, people failed rfa from other providers, i repeated it worked, however the successful rate of 2nd,3rd and 4th time of repeat decline is observed from my practice.
wow, interesting, just curious, do you have many patients treated with around 10 times rfa over 5-10 years? just try to learn more from this important procedure in our specialty, thanks.No offense but I haven’t seen that in my practice.
I trained with Paul Dreyfuss and I’m very particular about my RFA technique, it likely takes longer than many of you here, but I also haven’t seen more than a couple repeat RFA failures in my practice of over a dozen years.
Did you miss the part where he said some patients will start to experience relief 2 months after the lead is removed. This is what the literature shows as well. Don’t ask me how or why. But that was his reasoningWhy?
I didn't miss that part.Did you miss the part where he said some patients will start to experience relief 2 months after the lead is removed. This is what the literature shows as well. Don’t ask me how or why. But that was his reasoning
Very interesting- is your target the L3 medial branch or L4?
Also, I find that facet mediated pain isn’t always so pronounced in this patient and that they have a lot of myofascial pain - I wonder if it works for them.
Did you miss the part where he said some patients will start to experience relief 2 months after the lead is removed. This is what the literature shows as well. Don’t ask me how or why. But that was his reasoning
Personally, I wouldn't let the prior use of Sprint impact my decision to ablate or not ablate.
Yes,wow, interesting, just curious, do you have many patients treated with around 10 times rfa over 5-10 years? just try to learn more from this important procedure in our specialty, thanks.
I have a few pts who reliably get 8-12 months that I've burned 3-5 times.Yes,
I have personally repeated RFA up to 6 times on many patients with similar relief. My first job lasted for 6 years.
RFA still worked for all those patients the 6th time. I have also done RFA on an elderly patient from age 95-99 years. Worked every time, and then she died a few months before her 100th birthday.
I turned down an offer by their rep to bring lunch to my office. Showed up at my surgery center while I was doing cases the following week…
Thanks, maybe sometimes our criteria for lumbar rfa is too liberal imo, often together with mire or less disk, si joint, more segments facet arthropathy, myofascual pain etc. i very rarely saw complete relief from rfa that was reported from bogduk. Appreciated your input!Yes,
I have personally repeated RFA up to 6 times on many patients with similar relief. My first job lasted for 6 years.
RFA still worked for all those patients the 6th time. I have also done RFA on an elderly patient from age 95-99 years. Worked every time, and then she died a few months before her 100th birthday.
No offense but I haven’t seen that in my practice.
I trained with Paul Dreyfuss and I’m very particular about my RFA technique, it likely takes longer than many of you here, but I also haven’t seen more than a couple repeat RFA failures in my practice of over a dozen years.
This is the best way to learn my technique post fellowshipPlease share your technique!!
Never turn down free lunch.I turned down an offer by their rep to bring lunch to my office. Showed up at my surgery center while I was doing cases the following week…
I have done 2 or 3 cases.Who does it? What pathology? What are the results?
I have done 2 or 3 cases.
Lead fracture or dislodgment in all of them.
Each really liked the therapy while it was on, no benefit after it was gone.
All had significant multifidus marbling on MRI.
My n = 1 for LBP and she has lead in her still. My shoulder doesn't.Did you refer to have lead fragment removed or no?
We this before the “new” lead was released?
No - it's a tiny piece of metal less than a surgical staple. It's that tiny little piece that anchors the lead that usually breaks off.Did you refer to have lead fragment removed or no?
We this before the “new” lead was released?
"Conditionally approved."is that metal a contraindication for future MRI?
is that metal a contraindication for future MRI?
In my limited experiences,yes I do see patient has long and reliable relief from repeat rfa, however clinically I see quite common, more and more degeneration of spineal segments during the course of treatment, this is especially true for adjacent level pathologies, such as facet hypertrophy, separation of joint, the root of SAP, or junction of sap and tp is really difficult to access, what is your experiences about this? Appreciate it.Yes,
I have personally repeated RFA up to 6 times on many patients with similar relief. My first job lasted for 6 years.
RFA still worked for all those patients the 6th time. I have also done RFA on an elderly patient from age 95-99 years. Worked every time, and then she died a few months before her 100th birthday.