Stanford or UCSF for Anesthesia residency

This forum made possible through the generous support of SDN members, donors, and sponsors. Thank you.

sanay gandhi

New Member
10+ Year Member
15+ Year Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2007
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hello
I am desperate to know which is the better residency for Anesthesia and can someone please send pros and cons.
Thanks a lot
Sanay

Members don't see this ad.
 
both are high stressed...pick something else..
 
Hello
I am desperate to know which is the better residency for Anesthesia and can someone please send pros and cons.
Thanks a lot
Sanay

Both are good. If you have a chance at either one, you're golden. Go where you will be happy, both will train you well. :thumbup:
 
Both are good. If you have a chance at either one, you're golden. Go where you will be happy, both will train you well. :thumbup:

Historically, UCSF has been the stronger research program. If your goals include becoming a research type, that would be the place for you. Christian Apfel of PONV fame has recently relocated to UCSF. :thumbup:

UCSF used to have the bigger rep for jobs in the Bay area. That was a legacy of the Bunker years early 1970s.

Questions I heard when looking for a gig: "You know you do have to be able to give a spinal in private practice, son. Can you give a spinal?"

I enjoyed my time at Stanford aka the 'farm.' Larson succeeded Bunker in 1974 or 75. Much better clinical training.

Housing in either place is absurdly expensive.

Good luck. I don't think either would be bad choices.

aghast1
 
Top