- Joined
- Aug 25, 2007
- Messages
- 58
- Reaction score
- 0
anybody finds standford secondary challenging? Just to confirm, does academic medicine include clinical work as well as research and teaching....
thanks!!!!!
thanks!!!!!
Yup, Stanford likes being challenging
And I think Academic Medicine is JUST research and teaching (no clinical/patient care).
ya i looked at that secondary and am pretty sure i'm not applying there anymore....no publications for me yet, even though i should have one by next feb./mar....i feel stanford wants ppl that are really into research- which to me means at least presenting at a few conferences and maybe having a few publications by the time they apply...when i saw that publications section in the secondary, i figured i'd waste my money by applying there
No school requires publications no matter how research-heavy they are. If you are nearing publication then you are ahead of the game. A lot (not all) of the publications that undergrads get are cheap ones that have a lot of authors. If you have a strong research background/interest and a strong PI, you shouldn't give up just because you are not published...
Where did you see that section about publications?? i didn't .....what if you don't have a strong research background? is stanford out of the question if you only have minimal research and are more interested in other areas, such as public health or health care administration?
Where did you see that section about publications?? i didn't .....
thanks!
That's just one case. I can hardly imagine a school such as Stanford (the largest of whose secondary essays dealt with diversity) only being interested in students heavily interested in basic-science research. Have you seen what some of their scholarly concentrations are? Once, for instance, focuses on the "medical humanities," investigating things like the literary, spiritual, and philosophical notions of health and disease.As I said in the other Stanford post, they are extremely basic science research focused. My brother was a Stanford undergrad and didn't even receive an interview there (3.8/35) and had acceptances from HMS, UM, JHU, Wash U, Cornell, and others. He had good ECs, but his research was clinical and not basic science.
That's just one case. I can hardly imagine a school such as Stanford (the largest of whose secondary essays dealt with diversity) only being interested in students heavily interested in basic-science research. Have you seen what some of their scholarly concentrations are? Once, for instance, focuses on the "medical humanities," investigating things like the literary, spiritual, and philosophical notions of health and disease.
Stanford also likes people who are well-rounded (i.e. involved in the arts or sports in addition to bio stuff). This info is from my lab PI, who has been an interviewer for Stanford for several years.
Every time I talk to him, he keeps asking if I do anything artistic or athletic Makes me feel inferior. I'm like... "I like to play basketball and swim for fun, and I also knit and play the piano for relaxation purposes... does that count?"
Odd - if you didn't know, Stanford does not screen, so you should receive a secondary... If it's been a while and you are still interested, give them a call.I never got their secondary :\.
I heard there are a lot of essays though, so I'm not really interested anyways. If it's as research oriented as people say, I'm probably a bad fit there.
According to our records, you have been invited to submit a supplemental application. However, it has not yet been completed and submitted. If you intend to submit the application to the Stanford University School of Medicine, we encourage you to do so as soon as possible. The final deadline is November 15, 2007.
If you intend to withdraw your application, please notify our office in writing.
You may check the status of your application (letters of recommendations expected, received, and fee payment) at our website: https://med.stanford.edu/aes/
Please keep in mind that the receipt status of letters of recommendation may take a few days to be updated on the status website from when we actually receive them in our office.
Thank you for your interest in Stanford University School of Medicine.
It is NOT necessary for you to respond to this email message.
Sincerely,
Office of Medical School Admissions Staff
Bah! Stanford just sent me an email, basically bugging me to turn in my secondary! It's been a tiny bit over 2 weeks, and I was going to submit today... I'm a tad annoyed that they sent this:
No school requires publications no matter how research-heavy they are. If you are nearing publication then you are ahead of the game. A lot (not all) of the publications that undergrads get are cheap ones that have a lot of authors. If you have a strong research background/interest and a strong PI, you shouldn't give up just because you are not published...
Everyone gets a secondary (not screened). They interviewed 485 last year.The only thing I was concerned about is that they are so selective...I figure they'd just choose the ppl that were already ahead of the game and had some pubs...but, maybe not..does anyone know the # of people that get secondaries and the # that get interviews?
Everyone gets a secondary (not screened). They interviewed 485 last year.
Do you have any experience working in a multicultural area, or maybe with an underserved community...if so you want to put it there.I am a white, upper middle class female with no real culture, race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic issues in my background. How do I answer the diversity question? I was thinking something along the lines of: my parents got divorced when I was young, so I started working early because I wanted to gain independence from their financial spats- this taught me work ethic. It sort of taps into early life and work experiences, but I'm not really sure if that answers the question. Advice?
I am a white, upper middle class female with no real culture, race, ethnicity, or socioeconomic issues in my background. How do I answer the diversity question? I was thinking something along the lines of: my parents got divorced when I was young, so I started working early because I wanted to gain independence from their financial spats- this taught me work ethic. It sort of taps into early life and work experiences, but I'm not really sure if that answers the question. Advice?