- Joined
- Aug 15, 2003
- Messages
- 828
- Reaction score
- 4
Judging by the sheer volume of review textbooks out there and all the question books and online Qbanks available to direct your studies, I'm curious why people in general don't always do as well as they had expected to. My question is this:
Are these review books really representative of a huge majority of the information on the Step 1, or are there still 50 or so questions out of the 350 that cover random information (like some obscure disease or treatment that no one's expecting to be asked about).
Another, and perhaps better, way of asking my question is what exactly makes the difficult questions on Step 1, "difficult"? Is it because they expect you to know some random small detail, or some obscure disease or graphical presentation, or is it because they are really involved and require you to stop and really work through them? From my experience of working review questions, it seems that most of the difficult ones involve the most RANDOM information I've ever seen and never would've thought to be important.
Any help would be appreciated..
Are these review books really representative of a huge majority of the information on the Step 1, or are there still 50 or so questions out of the 350 that cover random information (like some obscure disease or treatment that no one's expecting to be asked about).
Another, and perhaps better, way of asking my question is what exactly makes the difficult questions on Step 1, "difficult"? Is it because they expect you to know some random small detail, or some obscure disease or graphical presentation, or is it because they are really involved and require you to stop and really work through them? From my experience of working review questions, it seems that most of the difficult ones involve the most RANDOM information I've ever seen and never would've thought to be important.
Any help would be appreciated..